14 Final 28 9 Final 20 7 Final 42 14 Final 51 7 Final 38 31 Final 35 45 Final 19 9 Final 56 24 Final 34 0 Final 34 20 Final 27 13 Final 16 14 Final 62 48 Final 45 0 Final 66 17 Final 45 3 Final 77 22 Final 44 10 Final 42 7 Final 55 22 Final 32 31 Final 42 0 Final 70 36 Final 27 12 Final 59 43 Final 36 13 Final 20 6 Final 45 24 Final 38 16 Final 27 30 Final 23 7 Final 31 20 Final 34 17 Final 72 27 Final 26 6 Final 28 33 Final 30 3 Final 69 17 Final 45 7 Final 31 10 Final 17 10 Final 42 18 Final 16 20 Final 38 17 Final 20 14 Final 56 21 Final 20 6 Final 54 3 Final 56 14 Final 56 9 Final 63 3 Final 35 33 Final 31 24 Final 21 21 Final 45 17 Final 21 38 Final 16 20 Final 3 7 Final 68 10 Final 38 3 Final 45 35 Final 9 28 Final 23 40 Final 42 20 Final 59 13 Final 24 0 Final 68 44 Final 20 0 Final 13 17 Final 34 7 Final 23 20 Final 24 3 Final 42 0 Final 73 23 Final 30 10 Final 34 14 Final 21 17 Final 42 3 Final 48 13 Final 36 3 Final 27 10 Final 70 20 Final 37

UTSA

Conference: American
Power Rank: 1.7
Record: 6-6
ATS: 6-4-2
O/U: 6-4-2

2025 Schedule

Location
Opponent
Result
ATS
O/U
at
Texas A&M
L 24-42
W
Over
vs
Texas State
L 36-43
Push
Push
vs
Incarnate Word
W 48-20
Push
Push
at
Colorado State
W 17-16
L
Under
at
Temple
L 21-27
L
Under
vs
Rice
W 61-13
W
Over
at
North Texas
L 17-55
L
Over
vs
Tulane
W 48-26
W
Over
at
South Florida
L 23-55
L
Over
at
Charlotte
W 28-7
W
Under
vs
East Carolina
W 58-24
W
Over
vs
Army
L 24-27
W
Under
vs
Florida International
W 57-20
Push
Push

Latest Preview (Week Recent)

Robert Henry Jr. emerges as elite offensive weapon

Henry dominated with 177 yards rushing on just 16 carries and 2 touchdowns, including a spectacular 75-yard TD run. His 11.1 yards per carry average shows he can break big plays against any defense and establishes him as the clear star of the offense despite having Owen McCown at quarterback.

Defense struggled against explosive plays

UTSA allowed 42 points and couldn't contain Texas A&M's big-play ability, giving up multiple long touchdown passes and an 80-yard punt return TD. The defense's inability to get stops in crucial moments allowed A&M to pull away in the second half despite competitive play early.

Competitive effort shows potential despite loss

Coach Jeff Traylor noted the team 'played about as good as we could have honestly' and kept pace with ranked Texas A&M through much of the game, trailing just 21-17 early in the second half. This suggests UTSA can compete well against quality opponents when executing properly.

Ground game effectiveness provides blueprint for success

UTSA's rushing attack was highly effective, with Henry averaging over 11 yards per carry and consistently finding big gains. This ground game success against a Power 4 opponent shows they can control games and sustain drives when they establish the run early.