Rutgers defeated Miami (OH) 45–17 in a dominant performance. Rutgers covered by 12.5; Game went Over by 16.5.
Adjust any factor to update your projected line
Positive adjustment = favours home team
At kick-off, conditions at SHI Stadium were Thundery outbreaks possible, 79.7°F, Heat Index 84.9°F with winds of 7.8 mph. Precipitation chance is 100%, pointing to a wet-field game. High precip probability increases fumble risk and typically compresses both team totals. Historical weather data for this game is preserved in the panel below.
79.7°F
Miami (OH) travels 549 miles to this game, a moderate road trip.
Rutgers won by 28 in a dominant performance.
Rutgers covered the spread by a solid margin.
The total went Over by 16.5 points.
Precipitation chance is 100%, pointing to a wet-field game. High precip probability increases fumble risk and typically compresses both team totals.
Full conditions are shown in the data panel above. Forecast data sourced from WeatherAPI.com. Use the Line Value Calculator to apply a manual weather adjustment to your projected line.
Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Rutgers (2.2) over Miami (OH) (-6.3) by 8.5 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. Rutgers brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.1). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.
Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input: cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.
Rutgers won and Rutgers covered the spread.
