West Virginia Mountaineers is 1-0 on the season, 0-1 against the spread, and holds a power rating of -2.5. West Virginia Mountaineers enters the season with a power rating of -2.5, placing them below average relative to the FBS midpoint. The West Virginia Mountaineers host UT Martin next in Week 2. In 2025, West Virginia Mountaineers went 4-8 overall, 6-6 against the spread, and 5-7 on totals.
In Week 1 of 2026 the West Virginia Mountaineers Power Rating of -2.5 is 2.5 points below the FBS average according to Blue Chip Analytics. West Virginia Mountaineers have logged 0 miles of travel so far, out of a season total of 10,179 miles, ranking 31st heaviest in the FBS.
Scotty Fox Jr. QB, Michael Hawkins Jr. QB, Cam Cook RB, Nick Krahe OL, Landen Livingston OL, DJ Epps WR, John Neider WR, Prince Strachan WR, TaRon Francis WR
Harper Holloman EDGE, Zeke Durham-Campbell DE
Bryan Hansen P, Jack Cassidy K, Peter Notaro K
| After | Record | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Week 2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Week 3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-3 |
| Week 4 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-4 |
| Week 5 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Week 6 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| Week 8 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 3-4 |
| Week 9 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| Week 10 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 4-5 |
| Week 11 | 4-6 | 5-5 | 4-6 |
| Week 12 | 4-7 | 6-5 | 5-6 |
| Week 14 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 5-7 |
A season record is a record, not a forecast. Blue Chip Analytics' own research finds that beating the closing line repeats at close to zero from one season to the next - see most underrated and overrated teams. Read the table as what happened, not as what is likely to happen next.
Opened -2.7 in the preseason and finished -2.5 after week 2, a move of +0.2 points. High -1.4 (week 1), low -2.7 (the preseason).
PreW2
SP+ is an independent opponent-adjusted efficiency rating, one of the systems blended into the Blue Chip Analytics power rating rather than a Blue Chip Analytics number itself. Defensive SP+ measures points allowed, so a lower figure is a better defence - the rank beside it already accounts for that.
Source spread is how far apart the independent rating systems are on this team, not a margin of error on our own number. A wide spread means the models disagree, which is itself worth knowing.
The measured and applied home field advantage agree to within 0.1 points here, so smoothing changes little for this venue.
| Opponent | Met | Record | ATS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma State | 9 | 2-7 | 2-6-1 |
| Iowa State | 8 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| Arizona | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 |
| Cincinnati | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 |
| TCU | 9 | 6-3 | 8-1 |
| Texas Tech | 10 | 4-6 | 4-6 |
| Kansas | 9 | 7-2 | 2-7 |
| Houston | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Utah | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
No meeting on record since 2016: Coastal Carolina, UT Martin, Virginia.
Week 010,179 mi total
| Week | Opponent | Distance | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | - | Bye | |
| Week 1 | Coastal Carolina | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 2 | UT Martin | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 3 | Virginia | 309 mi | 618 mi |
| Week 4 | Oklahoma State | Home | 618 mi |
| Week 5 | Iowa State | 734 mi | 2,087 mi |
| Week 6 | Arizona | Home | 2,087 mi |
| Week 7 | Cincinnati | Home | 2,087 mi |
| Week 8 | TCU | 1,082 mi | 4,251 mi |
| Week 9 | - | Bye | |
| Week 10 | Texas Tech | 1,284 mi | 6,819 mi |
| Week 11 | Kansas | Home | 6,819 mi |
| Week 12 | Houston | Home | 6,819 mi |
| Week 13 | Utah | 1,680 mi | 10,179 mi |
| Week 14 | - | Bye | |
| Week 15 | - | Bye | |
| Week 16 | - | Bye | |
| Postseason | - | Bye | |
The Mountaineers' rebuilt offense, centered on transfer running back Cam Cook and quarterback Michael Hawkins Jr., delivered a promising debut. Cook, who led Division I in rushing last year with 1,659 yards, ran for 142 yards and two touchdowns against Coastal Carolina, including a 72-yard burst on the first play from scrimmage. Hawkins, the Oklahoma transfer, added 103 rushing yards and threw for 132 yards and a touchdown, showing the dual-threat ability Rich Rodriguez wants. The offensive line, which added five transfers with 91 combined starts, helped the team rack up 336 first-half yards. However, the unit stalled after halftime, managing just 77 yards and punting on four straight possessions, a reminder that consistency remains a work in progress.
West Virginia's defense dominated early, allowing only five first downs in the first half and building a 24-0 lead. But after halftime, the unit looked porous, surrendering three touchdown passes to Coastal Carolina's redshirt freshman quarterback Deuce Bailey, who finished with 373 passing yards. The Chanticleers outgained the Mountaineers 425-413 overall, exposing issues in pass coverage and pressure that coordinator Zac Alley will need to address. The defense features new faces like edge rusher Harper Holloman and end Zeke Durham-Campbell, but the second-half collapse shows that chemistry and depth are still developing.
Michael Hawkins Jr. seized the starting role in Week 1, and his performance justified the choice. He was efficient through the air, completing 11 of 14 passes, and dangerous on the ground, leading the team in rushing attempts. His 49-yard touchdown pass to Armoni Weaver-Bomar highlighted his arm strength, while his 11-yard scoring run showed his ability to make plays with his legs. Sophomore Scotty Fox Jr., who started last season, remains a capable backup, but Hawkins' dual-threat skill set fits Rodriguez's system perfectly. The only blemish was a lost fumble at the goal line, a mistake that will need to be cleaned up as the season progresses.
Despite the win, West Virginia showed signs of sloppiness that could hurt them in Big 12 play. The team committed costly mistakes, including Hawkins' fumble and a general lack of discipline that running back Cam Cook acknowledged after the game. The offense's inability to sustain drives in the second half allowed Coastal Carolina to rally, turning a blowout into a one-score game. Head coach Rich Rodriguez, who has a track record of improving teams in Year 2, will likely emphasize cleaning up these errors. With 88 new players on the roster, the Mountaineers are still building cohesion, but the margin for error will shrink against tougher conference opponents.
West Virginia opens with a home game against FCS opponent UT Martin, a matchup where they are heavy favorites and should have a chance to refine their execution. The early non-conference slate provides a buffer to work out kinks before the grind of Big 12 play. The Mountaineers' home-field advantage in Morgantown is strong, and they have minimal travel early in the season. However, the second-half defensive lapses and offensive inconsistency seen against Coastal Carolina are red flags that must be fixed before facing more balanced and athletic conference rosters. The team's success will hinge on whether they can play a full 60 minutes with the same intensity they showed in the first half of Week 1.
West Virginia Mountaineers is 0-1 against the spread in the 2026 season, covering 0% of games.
West Virginia Mountaineers holds a Blue Chip Analytics power rating of -2.5, representing their expected point margin against an average FBS team on a neutral field.
West Virginia Mountaineers's home field advantage rating is 2.5 points, the venue adjustment Blue Chip Analytics applies for games at their home stadium.
West Virginia Mountaineers's consensus regular-season win total for 2026 is 5.5 wins, priced at -150 over and +115 under. This is the betting market's expectation, not a Blue Chip Analytics projection.
West Virginia Mountaineers travels 10,179 miles in the 2026 season, ranking 31st heaviest in the FBS.
Cumulative travel distance counts both the outbound and return journey for every away game. For example, if a team travels 374 miles to play an away game, Blue Chip Analytics counts 748 miles (374 miles there, 374 miles back) toward the cumulative total. Home games and bye weeks add zero miles. The per-week Distance column shows the one-way distance only, as the return trip happens after the game is played.
West Virginia Mountaineers: 1-0 overall, 0-1 ATS, power rating -2.5 (2026 records).