26
Final
23
38
Final
61
13
Final
20
30
Final
24
34
Final
6
31
Final
34
34
Final
41
16
Final
35
19
Final
16
38
Final
35
14
Final
28
28
Final
31
38
Final
45
14
Final
42
24
Final
20
13
Final
6
20
Final
59
49
Final
51
23
Final
52
24
Final
37
38
Final
17
24
Final
25
28
Final
27
20
Final
35
10
Final
21
24
Final
27
56
Final
21
31
Final
39
24
Final
31
20
Final
31
49
Final
39
10
Final
13
23
Final
15
10
Final
28
17
Final
34
49
Final
27
17
Final
28
20
Final
24
21
Final
14
13
Final
28
31
Final
35
0
Final
26
31
Final
10
49
Final
56
20
Final
16
24
Final
57
32
Final
38
3
Final
39
17
Final
20
7
Final
24
27
Final
34
17
Final
34
31
Final
30
42
Final
19
16
Final
21
13
Final
21
West Virginia Mountaineers is 5-3 on the season, 4-3-1 against the spread, and holds a power rating of +0.8. West Virginia Mountaineers carries one of the heaviest travel loads in the FBS, ranked 31st with 10,179 miles travelled this season, a meaningful fatigue factor for away games. The West Virginia Mountaineers head to Texas Tech next in Week 10.
In Week 8 of 2026 the West Virginia Mountaineers Power Rating of +0.8 is 0.8 points above the FBS average according to Blue Chip Analytics. West Virginia Mountaineers have logged 4,251 miles of travel so far, out of a season total of 10,179 miles, ranking 31st heaviest in the FBS.
Scotty Fox Jr. QB, Michael Hawkins Jr. QB, Cam Cook RB, Nick Krahe OL, Landen Livingston OL, DJ Epps WR, John Neider WR, Prince Strachan WR, TaRon Francis WR
Harper Holloman EDGE, Zeke Durham-Campbell DE
Bryan Hansen P, Jack Cassidy K, Peter Notaro K
| After | Record | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Week 2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Week 3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-3 |
| Week 4 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-4 |
| Week 5 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Week 6 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| Week 8 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 3-4 |
| Week 9 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| Week 10 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 4-5 |
| Week 11 | 4-6 | 5-5 | 4-6 |
| Week 12 | 4-7 | 6-5 | 5-6 |
| Week 14 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 5-7 |
A season record is a record, not a forecast. Blue Chip Analytics' own research finds that beating the closing line repeats at close to zero from one season to the next - see most underrated and overrated teams. Read the table as what happened, not as what is likely to happen next.
Opened -2.7 in the preseason and finished +0.8 after week 8, a move of +3.5 points. High +3.0 (week 4), low -2.7 (the preseason).
PreW8
SP+ is an independent opponent-adjusted efficiency rating, one of the systems blended into the Blue Chip Analytics power rating rather than a Blue Chip Analytics number itself. Defensive SP+ measures points allowed, so a lower figure is a better defence - the rank beside it already accounts for that.
Source spread is how far apart the independent rating systems are on this team, not a margin of error on our own number. A wide spread means the models disagree, which is itself worth knowing.
The measured and applied home field advantage agree to within 0.1 points here, so smoothing changes little for this venue.
| Opponent | Met | Record | ATS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma State | 9 | 2-7 | 2-6-1 |
| Iowa State | 8 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| Arizona | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 |
| Cincinnati | 2 | 2-0 | 2-0 |
| TCU | 9 | 6-3 | 8-1 |
| Texas Tech | 10 | 4-6 | 4-6 |
| Kansas | 9 | 7-2 | 2-7 |
| Houston | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Utah | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
No meeting on record since 2016: Coastal Carolina, UT Martin, Virginia.
Week 010,179 mi total
| Week | Opponent | Distance | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | - | Bye | |
| Week 1 | Coastal Carolina | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 2 | UT Martin | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 3 | Virginia | 309 mi | 618 mi |
| Week 4 | Oklahoma State | Home | 618 mi |
| Week 5 | Iowa State | 734 mi | 2,087 mi |
| Week 6 | Arizona | Home | 2,087 mi |
| Week 7 | Cincinnati | Home | 2,087 mi |
| Week 8 | TCU | 1,082 mi | 4,251 mi |
| Week 9 | - | Bye | |
| Week 10 | Texas Tech | 1,284 mi | 6,819 mi |
| Week 11 | Kansas | Home | 6,819 mi |
| Week 12 | Houston | Home | 6,819 mi |
| Week 13 | Utah | 1,680 mi | 10,179 mi |
| Week 14 | - | Bye | |
| Week 15 | - | Bye | |
| Week 16 | - | Bye | |
| Postseason | - | Bye | |
West Virginia's offense has been one of the most explosive in the country, averaging over 500 yards per game. Quarterback Michael Hawkins Jr., a transfer from Oklahoma, has been dynamic, throwing for 464 yards and accounting for five touchdowns in the win over Cincinnati. Running back Cam Cook, the nation's leading rusher last season, has been a workhorse, rushing for 193 yards against Oklahoma State and 141 against Arizona. The offensive line, rebuilt with five transfers, has paved the way for a prolific ground game. The Mountaineers have scored 31 or more points in every game and have surpassed 1,000 combined yards in four straight contests.
The defense has been a major liability, allowing 40 or more points in three consecutive games and ranking last in the Big 12 in total defense (456.6 yards per game). Opposing quarterbacks have shredded the secondary, with Coastal Carolina's Deuce Bailey throwing for 373 yards, Oklahoma State's Drew Mestemaker for 389, and Arizona's Noah Fifita for 341. Defensive coordinator Zac Alley called his unit 'the worst defense in college football' after a 593-yard average in losses to Oklahoma State and Iowa State. The pass rush has been inconsistent, and the secondary has been plagued by blown coverages and penalties.
West Virginia has developed a troubling pattern of fading after fast starts. Against Coastal Carolina, they led 24-0 but were outscored 24-7 in the second half and managed just 77 yards after halftime. Against UT Martin, the defense allowed 246 first-half yards. In Big 12 play, they have been outscored in the second half of losses to Oklahoma State, Iowa State, and Arizona. The team has yet to put together a complete four-quarter performance, and the defense has been particularly vulnerable after halftime adjustments by opponents.
Kicker Jack Cassidy, a transfer from Western Kentucky, has had an up-and-down season but delivered the game-winning 35-yard field goal as time expired to beat Cincinnati. Punter Bryan Hansen has been solid. The special teams units have been generally reliable, but coverage has had lapses, such as Cassidy's kickoff out of bounds against Cincinnati. The return game has been modest, but the kicking game has been a strength in close contests.
At 4-3, West Virginia needs two more wins to become bowl eligible. The offense is capable of keeping them in any game, but the defense must improve for the team to reach the postseason. The schedule remains challenging, with a road trip to TCU next. The Mountaineers will need to find answers on defense, perhaps through scheme adjustments or personnel changes, to support their high-powered offense. If the defense can make even modest improvements, West Virginia has the firepower to compete in the Big 12.
West Virginia Mountaineers is 4-3-1 against the spread in the 2026 season, covering 57% of games.
West Virginia Mountaineers holds a Blue Chip Analytics power rating of +0.8, representing their expected point margin against an average FBS team on a neutral field.
West Virginia Mountaineers's home field advantage rating is 2.5 points, the venue adjustment Blue Chip Analytics applies for games at their home stadium.
West Virginia Mountaineers's consensus regular-season win total for 2026 is 5.5 wins, priced at -150 over and +115 under. This is the betting market's expectation, not a Blue Chip Analytics projection.
West Virginia Mountaineers travels 10,179 miles in the 2026 season, ranking 31st heaviest in the FBS.
Cumulative travel distance counts both the outbound and return journey for every away game. For example, if a team travels 374 miles to play an away game, Blue Chip Analytics counts 748 miles (374 miles there, 374 miles back) toward the cumulative total. Home games and bye weeks add zero miles. The per-week Distance column shows the one-way distance only, as the return trip happens after the game is played.
West Virginia Mountaineers: 5-3 overall, 4-3-1 ATS, power rating +0.8 (2026 records).