Week 2 • September 12, 2026, 04:00 AM UTC
0-0
FCS
Power Rank: -28.0
@
0-0
MAC
Power Rank: -8.7

By · Last updated

Central Michigan (power rating: -8.7) holds a 19.3-point edge over Colgate (-28.0) on a neutral field per Blue Chip Analytics. Central Michigan's home field adds 2.5 points to that edge at Kelly/Shorts Stadium. See Line Value below.

General Information

Week: Week 2
Kick Off (at stadium): 12:00 AM EDT
Stadium: Kelly/Shorts Stadium
Capacity: 35,127
Elevation: 807 ft
HFA Rating: 2.5
Playing Surface: Artificial Turf

Betting Information

Spread None
Total (O/U) -
Odds Implied Score -
Power Rank Implied Line Central Michigan -19.3

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line Central Michigan +19.3
Implied value
Current line — edit to adjust
Central Michigan perspective
Power ratings — edit to adjust
Colgate
Central Michigan
Home field — Kelly/Shorts Stadium
Weather: Patchy rain nearby
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

Does weather affect Colgate vs Central Michigan at Kelly/Shorts Stadium?

Game-time forecast at Kelly/Shorts Stadium shows Patchy rain nearby — 71.4°F, Feels Like 63.9°F with winds of 0.7 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. The weather adjustment has been pre-filled in the Line Value Calculator above — adjust manually if conditions change before kick-off.

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: July 05, 2026
Patchy rain nearby

Patchy rain nearby

71.4°F

Feels Like: 63.9°F
Wind: 0.7 mph WNW
Gusts: 1.3 mph
Precipitation: 0.41"
Humidity: 86%
Rain Chance: 32%
Snow Chance: 0%

Travel & Rest

Colgate (Away)

This Week: 468.6 miles
Last Week: No Game
Season Total: 468.6 miles
Body Clock Time: 00:00
Rest Days: No Prior

Central Michigan (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: 2609.1 miles
Season Total: 2609.1 miles
Body Clock Time: 00:00
Rest Days: 6

What are the key factors for Colgate vs Central Michigan?

Central Michigan: Key Factors

Quarterback rotation and offensive identity

Central Michigan plans to use both Angel Flores (running threat) and Jadyn Glasser (pocket passer) at quarterback. Flores led the team in rushing last year with 527 yards and 8 TDs, while Glasser had a strong spring. The two-QB system adds unpredictability but also risks inconsistency, especially on the road against a New Mexico team that went 9-4 last season.

Defensive inexperience at linebacker and safety

The linebacker corps is completely rebuilt, with Xavier White and Victor Earl projected as starters but having limited experience. Safeties are also inexperienced, with Justin Taylor transferring in from Wyoming. This could be exploited by New Mexico's offense, especially if the Lobos test the middle of the field.

Long road trip and early-season travel challenge

Central Michigan travels 1,305 miles one-way to Albuquerque for the season opener. The team is in the middle of Michigan with little around it, making long road trips a logistical challenge. The 2.0 home-field advantage for New Mexico adds to the difficulty.

New Mexico's strong 2025 season and home-field edge

New Mexico finished 9-4 last season and is a tough non-conference opponent. Playing in Albuquerque with a clear, 53°F forecast gives the Lobos a comfortable environment. Central Michigan's defense, with many new starters, will face a stiff test early.

Offensive line experience vs. New Mexico's front

Central Michigan's offensive line is deeper and more experienced, led by left guard Jacob Russell who started every game last year. This unit will be key in establishing the run for Vaughn Blue and protecting the quarterbacks against New Mexico's defensive front.

What do the matchup numbers say?

Colgate travels 469 miles to this game, a moderate road trip.

How do Colgate and Central Michigan compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Central Michigan (-8.7) over Colgate (-28.0) by 19.3 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. Central Michigan brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.5). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

Blue Chip Analytics rates Central Michigan as the stronger team by 19.3 points on a neutral field; apply HFA and travel context before finalising a line read.