UTEP Miners is 0-1 on the season, 0-1 against the spread, and holds a power rating of -21.8. UTEP Miners enters the season with a power rating of -21.8, placing them below average relative to the FBS midpoint. The UTEP Miners host Texas Southern next in Week 2. In 2025, UTEP Miners went 2-10 overall, 3-9 against the spread, and 8-4 on totals.
In Week 1 of 2026 the UTEP Miners Power Rating of -21.8 is 21.8 points below the FBS average according to Blue Chip Analytics. UTEP Miners have logged 1,148 miles of travel so far, out of a season total of 10,239 miles, ranking 28th heaviest in the FBS.
EJ Colson QB, Tavorus Jones RB, Lamar Sperling RB, Elijah McCoy RB, Jaylan Brown WR, Carver Cheeks WR, Juan Camacho Jr. OL, Kam Thomas WR
Xavier Smith S, Justin Content CB, Jayden Wilson LB, Shay Smith LB, Ashton Coker DL, Derek Burns EDGE
Cade Hechter K, Brady Braun P
| After | Record | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Week 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Week 3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 1-2 |
| Week 4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| Week 5 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Week 7 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| Week 8 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 3-4 |
| Week 10 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 4-4 |
| Week 11 | 2-7 | 3-6 | 5-4 |
| Week 12 | 2-8 | 3-7 | 6-4 |
| Week 13 | 2-9 | 3-8 | 7-4 |
| Week 14 | 2-10 | 3-9 | 8-4 |
A season record is a record, not a forecast. Blue Chip Analytics' own research finds that beating the closing line repeats at close to zero from one season to the next - see most underrated and overrated teams. Read the table as what happened, not as what is likely to happen next.
Opened -20.8 in the preseason and finished -21.8 after week 2, a move of -1.0 points. High -20.3 (week 1), low -21.8 (week 2).
PreW2
SP+ is an independent opponent-adjusted efficiency rating, one of the systems blended into the Blue Chip Analytics power rating rather than a Blue Chip Analytics number itself. Defensive SP+ measures points allowed, so a lower figure is a better defence - the rank beside it already accounts for that.
Source spread is how far apart the independent rating systems are on this team, not a margin of error on our own number. A wide spread means the models disagree, which is itself worth knowing.
The measured and applied home field advantage agree to within 0.1 points here, so smoothing changes little for this venue.
| Opponent | Met | Record | ATS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| New Mexico | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Nevada | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
No meeting on record since 2016: Texas Southern, Michigan, Oregon State, San José State, North Dakota State, Hawai'i, Wyoming, Air Force, Northern Illinois.
Week 010,239 mi total
| Week | Opponent | Distance | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | - | Bye | |
| Week 1 | Oklahoma | 574 mi | 1,148 mi |
| Week 2 | Texas Southern | Home | 1,148 mi |
| Week 3 | Michigan | 1,445 mi | 4,038 mi |
| Week 4 | Oregon State | Home | 4,038 mi |
| Week 5 | New Mexico | 227 mi | 4,492 mi |
| Week 6 | Nevada | Home | 4,492 mi |
| Week 7 | San José State | Home | 4,492 mi |
| Week 8 | - | Bye | |
| Week 9 | North Dakota State | 1,164 mi | 6,820 mi |
| Week 10 | Hawai'i | Home | 6,820 mi |
| Week 11 | Wyoming | Home | 6,820 mi |
| Week 12 | Air Force | 507 mi | 7,834 mi |
| Week 13 | Northern Illinois | 1,203 mi | 10,239 mi |
| Week 14 | - | Bye | |
| Week 15 | - | Bye | |
| Week 16 | - | Bye | |
| Postseason | - | Bye | |
UTEP opened the season with a 51-0 loss at No. 10 Oklahoma, a result that underscored the talent and depth gap between the Miners and elite programs. The offense managed just 198 total yards and drove into field goal range twice in the first half, but both attempts were missed, leaving the team scoreless. The defense was on the field for Oklahoma's first eight possessions and allowed points on all of them. The loss was not unexpected, but it showed that the rebuilt offensive line, with four transfers starting together for the first time, struggled to protect quarterback EJ Colson and create running lanes against a top-tier defensive front.
EJ Colson, the FCS transfer from Incarnate Word, is the centerpiece of UTEP's hopes to revive an offense that ranked 112th in total yards last season. He brought dual-threat ability, having averaged nearly 12 carries per game and rushed for three touchdowns in 2025, but against Oklahoma he had little room to operate. The Miners need Colson to be a playmaker with both his arm and his legs, but the offensive line's inexperience is a major concern. If Colson can get time and use his mobility to extend drives, the offense could improve, but the early returns are not encouraging.
UTEP's defense ranked 110th in points allowed last year, and the opener did little to suggest major improvement. The secondary, led by safety Xavier Smith and corner Justin Content, was expected to be the strength, but Oklahoma's receivers were able to get open downfield. Linebacker Jayden Wilson, who had 92 tackles last season, and the defensive line, with Ashton Coker and Derek Burns, will need to generate more pressure and stop the run more effectively. The Miners face a softer schedule in the coming weeks, which will give the defense a chance to build confidence, but the unit must show it can hold up against Mountain West competition.
After the Oklahoma loss, UTEP returns home to face Texas Southern, an FCS opponent, in Week 2. This is a winnable game that should allow the Miners to get their first victory and work on offensive rhythm. The schedule includes other manageable matchups before conference play begins, giving the team a chance to develop chemistry and address issues. Head coach Scotty Walden, who has won only five games in two years, needs to see progress in these games to build confidence and establish a foundation for the Mountain West schedule.
UTEP brought in transfer kicker Cade Hechter, who was a second-team FCS All-American at UT Martin after making 15 of 17 field goals, but in the opener he missed two attempts. Those misses were costly, as they kept the Miners off the board and allowed Oklahoma to build momentum. Punter Brady Braun and returner Kam Thomas are also new to the team, and the unit as a whole needs to perform consistently. In close games later in the season, reliable kicking and punting could be the difference between a win and a loss.
UTEP Miners is 0-1 against the spread in the 2026 season, covering 0% of games.
UTEP Miners holds a Blue Chip Analytics power rating of -21.8, representing their expected point margin against an average FBS team on a neutral field.
UTEP Miners's home field advantage rating is 2.5 points, the venue adjustment Blue Chip Analytics applies for games at their home stadium.
UTEP Miners's consensus regular-season win total for 2026 is 3.5 wins, priced at +115 over and -145 under. This is the betting market's expectation, not a Blue Chip Analytics projection.
UTEP Miners travels 10,239 miles in the 2026 season, ranking 28th heaviest in the FBS.
Cumulative travel distance counts both the outbound and return journey for every away game. For example, if a team travels 374 miles to play an away game, Blue Chip Analytics counts 748 miles (374 miles there, 374 miles back) toward the cumulative total. Home games and bye weeks add zero miles. The per-week Distance column shows the one-way distance only, as the return trip happens after the game is played.
UTEP Miners: 0-1 overall, 0-1 ATS, power rating -21.8 (2026 records).