Week 11 • November 14, 2026, 05:00 AM UTC
0-0
MW
Power Rank: -7.7
@
0-0
CUSA
Power Rank: -18.8

By · Last updated

Wyoming (power rating: -7.7) carries a 11.1-point edge over UTEP (-18.8) on a neutral field per Blue Chip Analytics. UTEP's home field (Blue Chip HFA: 2.4) narrows that gap at Sun Bowl. Wyoming travels 660 miles for this game — check the travel panel for rest and body clock context. See Line Value below.

General Information

Week: Week 11
Kick Off (at stadium): 10:00 PM MST
Stadium: Sun Bowl
Capacity: 51,500
Elevation: 3904 ft
HFA Rating: 2.4
Playing Surface: Artificial Turf

Betting Information

Spread None
Total (O/U) -
Odds Implied Score -
Power Rank Implied Line Wyoming -11.1

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line UTEP -11.1
Implied value
Current line — edit to adjust
UTEP perspective
Power ratings — edit to adjust
Wyoming
UTEP
Home field — Sun Bowl
Weather: Clear
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

Does weather affect Wyoming vs UTEP at Sun Bowl?

Game-time forecast at Sun Bowl shows Clear — 81.3°F, Heat Index 80.2°F with winds of 5.4 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. The weather adjustment has been pre-filled in the Line Value Calculator above — adjust manually if conditions change before kick-off.

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: July 05, 2026
Clear

Clear

81.3°F

Heat Index: 80.2°F
Wind: 5.4 mph NE
Gusts: 6.7 mph
Precipitation: 0.0"
Humidity: 35%
Rain Chance: 1%
Snow Chance: 0%

Travel & Rest

Wyoming (Away)

This Week: 659.8 miles
Last Week: 1263.4 miles
Season Total: 7172.7 miles
Body Clock Time: 22:00
Rest Days: 7

UTEP (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: Home Game
Season Total: 6820.2 miles
Body Clock Time: 22:00
Rest Days: 7

What are the key factors for Wyoming vs UTEP?

Wyoming: Key Factors

New offensive identity under Hughes and Taylor

Wyoming's offense struggled last year (16.0 PPG) but returns a new QB in Tyler Hughes (FCS William & Mary transfer) who threw for 2,330 yards and 20 TDs and rushed for 670 yards and 11 scores. He reunites with OC Christian Taylor, who coached him at W&M and then spent time with the Buffalo Bills. The Cowboys also bring back leading rusher Samuel Harris (558 yards, 5.6 YPC) and add FCS All-OVC back Markell Holman (1,063 yards). This revamped run-pass threat could surprise Colorado State's defense in Week 1.

Defensive strength up the middle

Wyoming's defense finished fifth in the MWC in total defense last year and returns key pieces: MLB Ethan Stuhlsatz (strong spring, leadership), safety Jones Thomas (leading returning tackler, 2 INTs, 4 PBUs), and DT Dante Drake (missed 2025 with Achilles, expected to be top lineman). The unit also adds USC transfer LB Anthony Beavers. This core should keep the game close and limit big plays, especially against a Colorado State offense that may be breaking in new personnel.

Short travel and favorable weather

Wyoming travels only 57 miles to Colorado State, essentially a neutral-site feel with minimal travel fatigue. The forecast is clear, 48°F with light wind (4 mph), which is ideal for Wyoming's ground-and-pound style and should not hinder their kicking game (both kicker Erik Sandvik and punter Bart Edmiston return). This situational advantage helps the Cowboys execute their game plan from the start.

Special teams edge with Deion DeBlanc

Slot receiver Deion DeBlanc is also a dynamic return specialist, averaging 16.7 yards per punt return with a touchdown last year. In a low-scoring, field-position battle typical of Wyoming games, his ability to flip the field or create a short field for the offense could be a decisive factor against Colorado State.

Slow tempo, physical style wears on opponents

Wyoming's identity under Sawvel is to slow the game down, control the clock, and physically punish opponents with a massive offensive line (including a potential Day 2 NFL draft pick) and 240-pound linebackers. This approach, combined with a new OC from the Bills who will emphasize the run, is designed to keep Colorado State's offense off the field and wear down their defense in the second half.

UTEP: Key Factors

Quarterback transition and dual-threat potential

New QB EJ Colson (FCS Incarnate Word transfer) brings dual-threat ability, averaging nearly 12 carries per game last season. His mobility could be key against Oklahoma's defense, but he faces a massive step up in competition and a hostile road environment.

Offensive line overhaul faces elite pass rush

UTEP's offensive line features four transfers and one returning starter (RT Juan Camacho Jr.). Oklahoma's defensive front will test this unproven unit, especially with strong winds (29 mph) potentially disrupting passing timing and protection.

Defensive secondary strength vs. Oklahoma's passing attack

Safety Xavier Smith and corner Justin Content lead a veteran secondary that is the defense's strongest unit. They will need to contain Oklahoma's receivers, but the Miners' defense overall ranked 110th in points allowed last year and has many question marks.

Travel and weather factors

UTEP travels 574 miles to Norman, facing a 2.6-point home-field advantage for Oklahoma. Partly cloudy skies with 29 mph winds could affect kicking and deep passing, potentially favoring a ground-oriented game plan for both teams.

Program rebuild under Scotty Walden

Walden is 5-19 in two seasons, and the Miners are moving from C-USA to the Mountain West. This opener against a powerhouse like Oklahoma is a major test of progress, with the offense needing to prove it can compete after ranking 112th in total yards last year.

What do the matchup numbers say?

Wyoming travels 660 miles to this game, a moderate road trip.

How do Wyoming and UTEP compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Wyoming (-7.7) over UTEP (-18.8) by 11.1 points on a neutral field. Despite playing at home, UTEP faces a power rating deficit. Check whether the market spread accounts for this gap. UTEP brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.4). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

Blue Chip Analytics rates Wyoming as the stronger team by 11.1 points on a neutral field; apply HFA and travel context before finalising a line read.