Week 12 • November 21, 2026, 05:00 AM UTC
0-0
CUSA
Power Rank: -18.8
@
0-0
MW
Power Rank: -0.2

By · Last updated

Air Force (power rating: -0.2) holds a 18.6-point edge over UTEP (-18.8) on a neutral field per Blue Chip Analytics. Air Force's home field adds 2.6 points to that edge at Falcon Stadium. See Line Value below.

General Information

Week: Week 12
Kick Off (at stadium): 10:00 PM MST
Stadium: Falcon Stadium
Capacity: 39,441
Elevation: 6657 ft
HFA Rating: 2.6
Playing Surface: Artificial Turf

Betting Information

Spread None
Total (O/U) -
Odds Implied Score -
Power Rank Implied Line Air Force -18.6

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line Air Force +18.6
Implied value
Current line — edit to adjust
Air Force perspective
Power ratings — edit to adjust
UTEP
Air Force
Home field — Falcon Stadium
Weather: Clear
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

Does weather affect UTEP vs Air Force at Falcon Stadium?

Game-time forecast at Falcon Stadium shows Clear — 53.2°F, Wind Chill 52.9°F with winds of 3.6 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. The weather adjustment has been pre-filled in the Line Value Calculator above — adjust manually if conditions change before kick-off.

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: July 05, 2026
Clear

Clear

53.2°F

Wind Chill: 52.9°F
Wind: 3.6 mph SW
Gusts: 7.6 mph
Precipitation: 0.0"
Humidity: 54%
Rain Chance: 3%
Snow Chance: 0%

Travel & Rest

UTEP (Away)

This Week: 506.7 miles
Last Week: Home Game
Season Total: 7326.9 miles
Body Clock Time: 22:00
Rest Days: 7

Air Force (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: Home Game
Season Total: 6939.5 miles
Body Clock Time: 22:00
Rest Days: 7

What are the key factors for UTEP vs Air Force?

UTEP: Key Factors

Quarterback transition and dual-threat potential

New QB EJ Colson (FCS Incarnate Word transfer) brings dual-threat ability, averaging nearly 12 carries per game last season. His mobility could be key against Oklahoma's defense, but he faces a massive step up in competition and a hostile road environment.

Offensive line overhaul faces elite pass rush

UTEP's offensive line features four transfers and one returning starter (RT Juan Camacho Jr.). Oklahoma's defensive front will test this unproven unit, especially with strong winds (29 mph) potentially disrupting passing timing and protection.

Defensive secondary strength vs. Oklahoma's passing attack

Safety Xavier Smith and corner Justin Content lead a veteran secondary that is the defense's strongest unit. They will need to contain Oklahoma's receivers, but the Miners' defense overall ranked 110th in points allowed last year and has many question marks.

Travel and weather factors

UTEP travels 574 miles to Norman, facing a 2.6-point home-field advantage for Oklahoma. Partly cloudy skies with 29 mph winds could affect kicking and deep passing, potentially favoring a ground-oriented game plan for both teams.

Program rebuild under Scotty Walden

Walden is 5-19 in two seasons, and the Miners are moving from C-USA to the Mountain West. This opener against a powerhouse like Oklahoma is a major test of progress, with the offense needing to prove it can compete after ranking 112th in total yards last year.

Air Force: Key Factors

Offensive identity and QB Liam Szarka's dual-threat capability

Air Force's offense is built around the triple-option, with QB Liam Szarka as the focal point. He led the MWC in rushing TDs last season and has shown the ability to throw for 200+ yards. Against Duquesne's likely overmatched defense, expect a heavy dose of Szarka and FB Owen Allen to control the clock and wear down the opponent.

Defensive experience in the back seven vs. Duquesne's passing attack

Air Force returns almost its entire back eight on defense, including All-MWC LB Blake Fletcher and safety Roger Jones Jr. This experienced unit should be able to handle Duquesne's passing game, especially with corners Mikhail Seiken and Korey Johnson providing coverage. The Falcons' defense is poised to improve after a season of growing pains.

Inexperienced defensive line as a potential vulnerability

Graduation wiped out Air Force's defensive line, and the Falcons do not use transfers. This could be a weak point if Duquesne's offensive line can create running lanes or protect the passer. However, Duquesne's overall talent level may not be enough to exploit this inexperience.

Home-field advantage and favorable weather conditions

Air Force plays at home with a venue HFA of 2.6, and the forecast is clear with a temperature of 38°F and light wind. These conditions are ideal for Air Force's run-heavy offense, as cold weather often favors the running game and can make passing difficult for opponents.

No transfer portal usage ensures roster continuity and discipline

Air Force's unique policy of not using the transfer portal means the team has high continuity and discipline. This is especially beneficial early in the season, as the Falcons will have a cohesive unit that knows the system well, while Duquesne may have roster turnover. This should give Air Force an edge in execution.

What do the matchup numbers say?

UTEP travels 507 miles to this game, a moderate road trip.

How do UTEP and Air Force compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Air Force (-0.2) over UTEP (-18.8) by 18.6 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. Air Force brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.6). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

Blue Chip Analytics rates Air Force as the stronger team by 18.6 points on a neutral field; apply HFA and travel context before finalising a line read.