26
Final
23
38
Final
61
13
Final
20
30
Final
24
34
Final
6
31
Final
34
34
Final
41
16
Final
35
19
Final
16
38
Final
35
14
Final
28
28
Final
31
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
Indiana Hoosiers is 6-1 on the season, 1-6 against the spread, and holds a power rating of +23.0. Indiana Hoosiers holds a power rating of +23.0, ranking them among the stronger teams in the FBS and suggesting consistent line value as a favourite. The Indiana Hoosiers head to Michigan next in Week 8.
In Week 7 of 2026 the Indiana Hoosiers Power Rating of +23.0 is 23.0 points above the FBS average according to Blue Chip Analytics. Indiana Hoosiers have logged 2,398 miles of travel so far, out of a season total of 6,661 miles, ranking 75th heaviest in the FBS.
Josh Hoover QB, Carter Smith OL, Charlie Becker WR, Nick Marsh WR, Khobie Martin RB, Tyler Morris WR, Shazz Preston WR, Lee Beebe Jr. RB
Tobi Osunsanmi EDGE, AJ Harris CB, Tyrique Tucker DL, Mario Landino DL, Rolijah Hardy LB, Isaiah Jones LB
Nico Radicic K
| After | Record | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Week 2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Week 3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 |
| Week 4 | 4-0 | 3-1 | 3-1 |
| Week 5 | 5-0 | 3-2 | 3-2 |
| Week 7 | 6-0 | 4-2 | 3-3 |
| Week 8 | 7-0 | 4-3 | 4-3 |
| Week 9 | 8-0 | 5-3 | 5-3 |
| Week 10 | 9-0 | 6-3 | 6-3 |
| Week 11 | 10-0 | 6-4 | 7-3 |
| Week 12 | 11-0 | 6-5 | 7-4 |
| Week 14 | 12-0 | 7-5 | 8-4 |
| Week 15 | 13-0 | 8-5 | 8-5 |
| Postseason | 16-0 | 10-6 | 10-6 |
A season record is a record, not a forecast. Blue Chip Analytics' own research finds that beating the closing line repeats at close to zero from one season to the next - see most underrated and overrated teams. Read the table as what happened, not as what is likely to happen next.
Opened +27.6 in the preseason and finished +23.0 after week 8, a move of -4.6 points. High +28.4 (week 1), low +23.0 (week 8).
PreW8
SP+ is an independent opponent-adjusted efficiency rating, one of the systems blended into the Blue Chip Analytics power rating rather than a Blue Chip Analytics number itself. Defensive SP+ measures points allowed, so a lower figure is a better defence - the rank beside it already accounts for that.
Source spread is how far apart the independent rating systems are on this team, not a margin of error on our own number. A wide spread means the models disagree, which is itself worth knowing.
The measured and applied home field advantage agree to within 0.2 points here, so smoothing changes little for this venue.
| Opponent | Met | Record | ATS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Kentucky | 2 | 2-0 | 0-2 |
| Northwestern | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 |
| Rutgers | 8 | 5-3 | 3-5 |
| Nebraska | 4 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
| Ohio State | 10 | 1-9 | 5-5 |
| Michigan | 9 | 2-7 | 4-4-1 |
| Minnesota | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Washington | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 |
| Purdue | 9 | 4-5 | 2-7 |
No meeting on record since 2016: North Texas, Howard, USC.
Week 06,661 mi total
| Week | Opponent | Distance | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | - | Bye | |
| Week 1 | North Texas | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 2 | Howard | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 3 | Western Kentucky | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 4 | Northwestern | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 5 | Rutgers | 647 mi | 1,295 mi |
| Week 6 | Nebraska | 552 mi | 2,398 mi |
| Week 7 | Ohio State | Home | 2,398 mi |
| Week 8 | Michigan | 258 mi | 2,914 mi |
| Week 9 | Minnesota | Home | 2,914 mi |
| Week 10 | - | Bye | |
| Week 11 | USC | Home | 2,914 mi |
| Week 12 | Washington | 1,874 mi | 6,661 mi |
| Week 13 | Purdue | Home | 6,661 mi |
| Week 14 | - | Bye | |
| Week 15 | - | Bye | |
| Week 16 | - | Bye | |
| Postseason | - | Bye | |
Indiana is 6-1 and has extended its winning streak to 22 games, yet the Hoosiers are just 1-6 against the spread. The market has consistently set a higher bar than Indiana has cleared, largely because Curt Cignetti manages games conservatively once ahead, shortens quarters (as in the Howard game), and leans on the run to drain clock. The lone cover came at Rutgers, a 47-15 win that was the team's most complete performance. This gap between wins and margins is a defining storyline of the season.
Hoover, the TCU transfer replacing Heisman winner Fernando Mendoza, threw four touchdowns in each of his first two starts and did not turn the ball over in his first six games. However, his history at TCU suggests turnovers could come in bunches, and he lost a fumble in the Ohio State loss. His arm and decision-making have powered the offense, but ball security remains a watch point, especially against elite defenses.
Turbo Richard and Lee Beebe Jr. form a potent rushing duo, combining for 301 yards against Howard and both topping 100 yards at Rutgers. But Richard has dealt with an ankle injury, Khobie Martin is out with a broken arm, and the offensive line has been inconsistent in short-yardage situations. When the run game stalls, as it did at Nebraska (65 yards), the offense becomes one-dimensional and vulnerable.
The Hoosiers returned six starters from a unit that led the nation in tackles for loss and ranked second in sacks last season. They posted back-to-back shutouts against Howard and Western Kentucky and held Rutgers to 59 rushing yards. However, the secondary lost A.J. Harris and Jamari Sharpe to injuries in the opener, and Northwestern's Aidan Chiles threw for 293 yards and two touchdowns. Ohio State also moved the ball through the air effectively. If the pass rush does not get home, opposing quarterbacks can find soft spots.
Indiana's 22-game win streak ended with a 19-15 loss to Ohio State, a game in which the Hoosiers had a chance to win but came up just short. The schedule remains challenging with a road trip to Michigan next, followed by games against other Big Ten contenders. The Hoosiers have shown they can win close games (comebacks against Northwestern and Nebraska), but they must clean up penalties, protect the football, and get healthier in the secondary to stay in the Big Ten race.
Indiana Hoosiers is 1-6 against the spread in the 2026 season, covering 14% of games.
Indiana Hoosiers holds a Blue Chip Analytics power rating of +23.0, representing their expected point margin against an average FBS team on a neutral field.
Indiana Hoosiers's home field advantage rating is 2.6 points, the venue adjustment Blue Chip Analytics applies for games at their home stadium.
Indiana Hoosiers's consensus regular-season win total for 2026 is 10.5 wins, priced at +110 over and -140 under. This is the betting market's expectation, not a Blue Chip Analytics projection.
Indiana Hoosiers travels 6,661 miles in the 2026 season, ranking 75th heaviest in the FBS.
Cumulative travel distance counts both the outbound and return journey for every away game. For example, if a team travels 374 miles to play an away game, Blue Chip Analytics counts 748 miles (374 miles there, 374 miles back) toward the cumulative total. Home games and bye weeks add zero miles. The per-week Distance column shows the one-way distance only, as the return trip happens after the game is played.
Indiana Hoosiers: 6-1 overall, 1-6 ATS, power rating +23.0 (2026 records).