Week 1August 28, 2025, 11:30 PM UTC
6
0-0
FCS
Power Rank: -30.8
@
FINAL
61
0-0
SEC
Power Rank: 16.1

By · Last updated

Missouri defeated Central Arkansas 61–6 in a dominant performance. Missouri covered by 15.5; Game went Over by 13.5.

General Information

Week: Week 1
Kick Off (at stadium): 06:30 PM CDT
Stadium: Memorial Stadium
Capacity: 62,621
Elevation: 699 ft
HFA Rating: 2.4
Playing Surface: Artificial Turf

Betting Information

Spread Missouri -39.5
Total (O/U) 53.5
Odds Implied Score CARK 7.0 - 46.5 MIZ
Power Rank Implied Line Missouri -46.9
Prediction Markets Missouri 98% Win Chance (Kalshi)
Central Arkansas @ Missouri Preview

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line Missouri +46.9
Implied value
Current line - edit to adjust
Missouri perspective
Power ratings - edit to adjust
Central Arkansas
Missouri
Home field: Memorial Stadium
Weather: Overcast
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

What were the weather conditions for Central Arkansas vs Missouri?

At kick-off, conditions at Memorial Stadium were Overcast, 68.7°F, Feels Like 68.7°F with winds of 6.5 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. Historical weather data for this game is preserved in the panel below.

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: August 28, 2025
Overcast

Overcast

68.7°F

Feels Like: 68.7°F
Wind: 6.5 mph S
Gusts: 13.6 mph
Precipitation: 0.0"
Humidity: 86%
Rain Chance: 0%
Snow Chance: 0%

Travel & Rest

Central Arkansas (Away)

This Week: 265.9 miles
Last Week: No Game
Season Total: 265.9 miles
Body Clock Time: 18:30
Rest Days: No Prior

Missouri (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: No Game
Season Total: 0.0 miles
Body Clock Time: 18:30
Rest Days: No Prior

What are the key factors for Central Arkansas vs Missouri?

Central Arkansas: Key Factors

Offensive Struggles Against Power 5 Defense

Central Arkansas managed only 229 total yards and 6 points, with quarterback Luther Richesson completing 12 of 22 passes for just 70 yards. The offense failed to sustain drives or score touchdowns, indicating significant challenges against a higher-level opponent.

Rushing Attack Shows Some Promise

Landen Chambers provided a bright spot with 63 rushing yards, suggesting the ground game could be a key component moving forward. However, the overall offensive output was limited, and the team will need to build on this to compete in future games.

Defensive Vulnerabilities Exposed

Missouri's offense amassed 560 yards and 61 points, including two 99-yard touchdown drives. Central Arkansas struggled to contain both the pass and run, allowing big plays and consistent scoring, which will need to be addressed before facing Arkansas-Pine Bluff.

Penalties and Discipline Issues

While not specifically highlighted for Central Arkansas, the team's inability to force turnovers or create stops contributed to the lopsided score. Improving discipline and execution will be critical for the next game.

Opportunity for Rebound Against FCS Opponent

Central Arkansas faces Arkansas-Pine Bluff in their home opener next week, providing a chance to reset and compete against a more evenly matched FCS team. The Bears will need to leverage their rushing attack and tighten up defensively to secure a win.

What happened in the game?

Central Arkansas travels 266 miles to this game, a short road trip.

Missouri won by 55 in a dominant performance.

Missouri covered the spread comfortably.

The total went Over by 13.5 points.

How do Central Arkansas and Missouri compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Missouri (16.1) over Central Arkansas (-30.8) by 46.9 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. Missouri brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.4). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input: cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

Missouri won and Missouri covered the spread.