UAB Blazers is 0-1 on the season, 1-0 against the spread, and holds a power rating of -15.7. UAB Blazers enters the season with a power rating of -15.7, placing them below average relative to the FBS midpoint. The UAB Blazers host UL Monroe next in Week 2. In 2025, UAB Blazers went 4-8 overall, 4-8 against the spread, and 6-6 on totals.
In Week 1 of 2026 the UAB Blazers Power Rating of -15.7 is 15.7 points below the FBS average according to Blue Chip Analytics. UAB Blazers have logged 920 miles of travel so far, out of a season total of 5,788 miles, ranking 90th heaviest in the FBS.
Ryder Burton QB, Rod Robinson II RB, Ja'Vin Simpkins RB, Bam McReynolds RB, Kaleb Brown WR, Antonio Ferguson TE, Adam Lepkowski OL, Calib Perez OL
Cam Cunningham DL, Chris Spencer DL, Nigel Tate DL, Muaaz Byard LB, Ike Esonwune LB, Jeremiah Jordan S, Jotavian Pierce S, Delvon Gulley CB, Darrell Sweeting CB, Marlin Dean EDGE, Blanche Gold EDGE
Jonah Delange K, Owen Simpson K
| After | Record | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 |
| Week 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 |
| Week 3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 3-0 |
| Week 4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 4-0 |
| Week 6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 4-1 |
| Week 7 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 5-1 |
| Week 8 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 5-2 |
| Week 10 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 5-3 |
| Week 11 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 5-4 |
| Week 12 | 3-7 | 3-7 | 6-4 |
| Week 13 | 3-8 | 3-8 | 6-5 |
| Week 14 | 4-8 | 4-8 | 6-6 |
A season record is a record, not a forecast. Blue Chip Analytics' own research finds that beating the closing line repeats at close to zero from one season to the next - see most underrated and overrated teams. Read the table as what happened, not as what is likely to happen next.
Opened -14.2 in the preseason and finished -10.5 after the postseason, a move of +3.7 points. High -9.5 (week 15), low -14.7 (week 2).
PrePost
SP+ is an independent opponent-adjusted efficiency rating, one of the systems blended into the Blue Chip Analytics power rating rather than a Blue Chip Analytics number itself. Defensive SP+ measures points allowed, so a lower figure is a better defence - the rank beside it already accounts for that.
Source spread is how far apart the independent rating systems are on this team, not a margin of error on our own number. A wide spread means the models disagree, which is itself worth knowing.
The measured home field advantage of +3.9 is regressed to +2.8 before it is applied, a difference of 1.0 points. A single venue's raw result carries a lot of noise, so the applied figure is pulled toward the league pattern. See how much is home field advantage really worth.
| Opponent | Met | Record | ATS |
|---|---|---|---|
| UL Monroe | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Louisiana | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Navy | 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 |
| Memphis | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| South Florida | 3 | 1-2 | 2-1 |
| Charlotte | 4 | 2-2 | 1-3 |
| Temple | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 |
| UTSA | 7 | 4-3 | 4-3 |
| North Texas | 7 | 4-3 | 5-1-1 |
No meeting on record since 2016: Illinois, Samford, East Carolina.
Week 05,788 mi total
| Week | Opponent | Distance | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | - | Bye | |
| Week 1 | Illinois | 460 mi | 920 mi |
| Week 2 | UL Monroe | Home | 920 mi |
| Week 3 | Louisiana | 383 mi | 1,686 mi |
| Week 4 | Navy | Home | 1,686 mi |
| Week 5 | Samford | Home | 1,686 mi |
| Week 6 | Memphis | 212 mi | 2,110 mi |
| Week 7 | East Carolina | Home | 2,110 mi |
| Week 8 | - | Bye | |
| Week 9 | South Florida | 460 mi | 3,030 mi |
| Week 10 | Charlotte | Home | 3,030 mi |
| Week 11 | Temple | 781 mi | 4,591 mi |
| Week 12 | UTSA | Home | 4,591 mi |
| Week 13 | North Texas | 599 mi | 5,788 mi |
| Week 14 | - | Bye | |
| Week 15 | - | Bye | |
| Week 16 | - | Bye | |
| Postseason | - | Bye | |
Alex Mortensen takes over a program that bottomed out under Trent Dilfer, and he brings a fresh approach that has already won over outsiders. Mortensen, who went 2-4 in a partial first season, is praised for treating people well and genuinely wanting the job, a stark contrast to his predecessor. The Blazers are still early in the rebuild, and Mortensen's fingerprints are just starting to show, but the culture shift is real. The season opener at Illinois, where UAB is a 28-point underdog, will be a tough test, but the long-term trajectory under Mortensen looks more promising than it did a year ago.
Ryder Burton enters his first full season as the clear starter after showing flashes in two career starts, including a 251-yard, three-touchdown upset of Memphis. The Utah native has a strong arm and mobility, and he should benefit from a full offseason with the first-team offense. If he can build on those early performances, he gives UAB a reliable playmaker under center. The supporting cast around him, especially the running game, will be key to taking pressure off Burton and letting him develop into the leader this offense needs.
UAB's running back room is the deepest part of the roster, headlined by Georgia transfer Rod Robinson II, a 235-pound power back who has dealt with injuries but has big-play potential. Coastal Carolina transfer Ja'Vin Simpkins and ULM transfer Bam McReynolds combined for 1,228 rushing yards and five touchdowns last season, giving the Blazers three capable options. This trio can control the clock and keep the defense off the field, which will be crucial in a season where the offense may need to lean on the run early. If Robinson stays healthy, this group could be one of the best in the conference.
Defensive coordinator Todd Grantham has reshaped the unit with a focus on the middle, bringing in transfers like inside linebacker Ike Esonwune, who played under Grantham at Oklahoma State and contributed 31 tackles last year. The defensive line features 330-pound Nigel Tate, who is returning from a torn Achilles, alongside Cam Cunningham and Chris Spencer. The secondary is bolstered by Marshall transfer Darrell Sweeting, who could be the top coverage corner, and safeties Jeremiah Jordan and Jotavian Pierce. This group has more depth than last season, but the key will be staying healthy, especially up front, where Tate's return is a major boost.
Jonah Delange is a reliable weapon, having made 31 of 38 field goals and all 60 extra points over two seasons, giving UAB a steady scoring option in close games. The Blazers' overall success will hinge on avoiding injuries, particularly at wide receiver, where Kaleb Brown is coming off a spring ankle injury, and on the offensive line, where depth is a concern. If the team can stay healthy, Mortensen's squad has the pieces to be competitive in the American. The opener at Illinois is a daunting challenge, but the rest of the schedule offers opportunities for this team to show progress and build momentum for the future.
UAB Blazers is 1-0 against the spread in the 2026 season, covering 100% of games.
UAB Blazers holds a Blue Chip Analytics power rating of -15.7, representing their expected point margin against an average FBS team on a neutral field.
UAB Blazers's home field advantage rating is 2.8 points, the venue adjustment Blue Chip Analytics applies for games at their home stadium.
UAB Blazers's consensus regular-season win total for 2026 is 3.5 wins, priced at -115 over and -115 under. This is the betting market's expectation, not a Blue Chip Analytics projection.
UAB Blazers travels 5,788 miles in the 2026 season, ranking 90th heaviest in the FBS.
Cumulative travel distance counts both the outbound and return journey for every away game. For example, if a team travels 374 miles to play an away game, Blue Chip Analytics counts 748 miles (374 miles there, 374 miles back) toward the cumulative total. Home games and bye weeks add zero miles. The per-week Distance column shows the one-way distance only, as the return trip happens after the game is played.
UAB Blazers: 0-1 overall, 1-0 ATS, power rating -15.7 (2026 records).