Week 12 • November 21, 2026, 05:00 AM UTC
0-0
American
Power Rank: -0.4
@
0-0
American
Power Rank: -15.0

By · Last updated

UTSA (power rating: -0.4) carries a 14.6-point edge over UAB (-15.0) on a neutral field per Blue Chip Analytics. UAB's home field (Blue Chip HFA: 2.3) narrows that gap at Protective Stadium. UTSA travels 744 miles for this game — check the travel panel for rest and body clock context. See Line Value below.

General Information

Week: Week 12
Kick Off (at stadium): 11:00 PM CST
Stadium: Protective Stadium
Capacity: 47,100
Elevation: 623 ft
HFA Rating: 2.3
Playing Surface: Artificial Turf

Betting Information

Spread None
Total (O/U) -
Odds Implied Score -
Power Rank Implied Line UTSA -14.6

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line UAB -14.6
Implied value
Current line — edit to adjust
UAB perspective
Power ratings — edit to adjust
UTSA
UAB
Home field — Protective Stadium
Weather: Partly Cloudy
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

Does weather affect UTSA vs UAB at Protective Stadium?

Game-time forecast at Protective Stadium shows Partly Cloudy — 72.7°F, Feels Like 64.0°F with winds of 2.5 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. The weather adjustment has been pre-filled in the Line Value Calculator above — adjust manually if conditions change before kick-off.

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: July 05, 2026
Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

72.7°F

Feels Like: 64.0°F
Wind: 2.5 mph S
Gusts: 4.9 mph
Precipitation: 0.02"
Humidity: 92%
Rain Chance: 16%
Snow Chance: 0%

Travel & Rest

UTSA (Away)

This Week: 744.4 miles
Last Week: Home Game
Season Total: 4651.8 miles
Body Clock Time: 23:00
Rest Days: 7

UAB (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: 1561.0 miles
Season Total: 4590.9 miles
Body Clock Time: 23:00
Rest Days: 7

What are the key factors for UTSA vs UAB?

UTSA: Key Factors

Offensive tempo and downfield passing

New OC Rick Bowie plans to push tempo and take more deep shots. QB Owen McCown, entering his third year as starter, is key to executing this attack. The receiving corps is deep with returning standouts David Amador II and AJ Wilson plus impact transfers TJ West and James Madison II. If McCown is fully recovered from sports hernia surgery, UTSA's passing game could be explosive against a first-year FBS opponent.

Defensive reload with experienced transfers

UTSA lost most of its defense but added key transfers: LB Brandon Tucker (FCS All-America), S Nate Robinson Jr. (Marist), and CB Asaad Chapman (JUCO). The defensive line returns anchors Tai Leonard, Johnny Bowens III, and Jameian Buxton. The unit's ability to gel quickly will be tested, but the talent infusion and home dome environment should help against UTRGV's offense.

Home dome advantage and rest

The game is at home in a dome (HFA 2.9), eliminating weather concerns and giving UTSA a comfortable environment. No travel and a full offseason of rest provide optimal preparation. This should allow the Roadrunners to execute their new schemes cleanly and maintain energy throughout the game.

UTRGV's inexperience as a first-year FBS program

UT Rio Grande Valley is playing its first FBS season, likely lacking depth and experience at this level. UTSA's veteran roster, led by a third-year QB and a seventh-year head coach, should have a significant edge in discipline and execution. The Roadrunners can exploit mismatches early to build a comfortable lead.

Running back depth and versatility

Will Henderson III (866 yards, 6 TDs in 2025) returns as the lead back, with Cal transfer Brandon High Jr. adding depth. This duo can control the clock and wear down a less experienced defense. Their ability to run effectively will open up play-action for McCown and keep UTRGV's offense off the field.

UAB: Key Factors

New coaching staff and system transition

UAB enters the season under first-year head coach Alex Mortensen, who has completely overhauled the culture after Trent Dilfer's tenure. The team is still adapting to Mortensen's offensive system and Todd Grantham's defensive scheme, which could lead to early-season growing pains, especially on the road against a Power Five opponent.

Quarterback uncertainty and offensive firepower

Ryder Burton is the clear starter after limited experience (two career starts), but he has a strong supporting cast with a deep backfield featuring Rod Robinson II, Ja'Vin Simpkins, and Bam McReynolds. The offensive line returns key pieces, but wide receiver depth is a concern if Kaleb Brown is not fully recovered from an ankle injury. The offense's ability to sustain drives and avoid turnovers will be critical.

Defensive strength up the middle

Todd Grantham's defense is anchored by a formidable interior with tackles Cam Cunningham, Chris Spencer, and Nigel Tate, plus experienced inside linebackers Muaaz Byard and Ike Esonwune. Safeties Jeremiah Jordan and Jotavian Pierce provide stability. This unit should be effective against the run, but the secondary, with corners Delvon Gulley and Darrell Sweeting, faces a tough test against Illinois' passing attack.

Adverse weather conditions

The game is forecasted to be cloudy with 65°F and 22 mph winds. Strong winds can disrupt passing games and kicking, potentially favoring a run-heavy approach. UAB's deep backfield could be an advantage in such conditions, while Burton's inexperience in windy environments may lead to inaccurate throws.

Road environment and travel factors

UAB travels 460 miles to Champaign for a non-conference road game against Illinois, which has a significant home-field advantage (2.6). The Blazers have no prior game experience this season, so this will be their first test in a hostile environment. The team's ability to handle the crowd noise and travel fatigue will be crucial.

What do the matchup numbers say?

UTSA travels 744 miles to this game, a moderate road trip.

How do UTSA and UAB compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour UTSA (-0.4) over UAB (-15.0) by 14.6 points on a neutral field. Despite playing at home, UAB faces a power rating deficit. Check whether the market spread accounts for this gap. UAB brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.3). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

Blue Chip Analytics rates UTSA as the stronger team by 14.6 points on a neutral field; apply HFA and travel context before finalising a line read.