Week 4 •
Protective Stadium

Navy20 @FINAL 24UAB , Week 4, Sep 25, 2026

1-1 American Power rating: -1.9
1-2 American Power rating: -14.7

How did the line hold up?

Market line
NAVY -6.5
PM Implied
NAVY -5.3
Blue Chip model
NAVY -10.4
Edge
-3.9NAVY
See details
◂ favors NAVYfavors UAB ▸Market: NAVY -6.5
‹ 12.8 NAVY
Adjust the power ratings by team
The power ratings row was edited directly, please click reset to adjust by team
UAB
NAVY
UAB
no impact
no impact
2 NAVY2 UAB4 NAVY4 UABModel: NAVY -10.4

Betting information

Spread
NAVY -6.5
Total
51.5
Odds implied score
NAVY 29.0 – 22.5 UAB
Prediction markets
NAVY 70% win chance (Kalshi)

DraftKings · as of September 25, 2026

UAB defeated Navy 24–20 in a closely contested finish. UAB covered by 10.5; Game went Under by 7.5. The market closed at Navy -6.5 and the Blue Chip model made it Navy -10.4 - a gap of 3.9 points toward Navy, of which 2.6 points were beyond the model's measured factors. That was an information gap - the market pricing something the model does not carry - rather than a measured edge. Blue Chip Analytics had rated Navy 12.8 points stronger on a neutral field.

What are the key factors for Navy vs UAB?

Navy

Navy's pass defense is the fatal flaw the market is underweighting defenseFavorsUAB

Florida Atlantic's Caden Veltkamp torched Navy for five touchdown passes and 386 yards on 27-of-32 passing, with Easton Messer alone going for 179 yards and two scores. That came one week after Towson's Andrew Indorf threw for 208 yards and two long touchdowns on just 18 attempts. Navy's rebuilt pass rush, which lost All-America nose guard Landon Robinson, has generated almost nothing without blitzing, and the secondary has been beaten repeatedly over the top. UAB does not need to be explosive to exploit this; it only needs to throw efficiently. The market has Navy as a solid road favorite, but that price reflects the Midshipmen's rushing reputation and UAB's poor power rating, not the reality that Navy has allowed 594 passing yards and seven passing touchdowns in two games. This is the single biggest reason to doubt the market's confidence in Navy.

Navy's offense is one-dimensional and Braxton Woodson's passing has collapsed offenseFavorsUAB

Navy rushed for 506 yards against Towson and still has a dominant ground game, but the passing attack has been nonexistent. Woodson was 3-of-11 for 47 yards with an interception against Florida Atlantic, and the Midshipmen completed just six passes total as a team. When Navy fell behind 38-7, it could not throw its way back into the game; the comeback came on the ground and via a safety. UAB, which is 2-1 against the spread, has seen enough option-style offense to prepare, and if the Blazers load the box and force Woodson to beat them through the air, Navy has shown no evidence it can do so. The market's line assumes Navy's offense will move the ball at will, but the passing inefficiency makes that assumption fragile.

The 13-day rest and UAB's home-field advantage cut against Navy's road favorite status situationalFavorsUAB

Navy has not played since September 12, a 13-day layoff that followed a short week of preparation for Florida Atlantic. While rest can help heal injuries, it also risks rust for an option offense that relies on timing and repetition. UAB has a real home-field advantage, and Navy is traveling 687 miles for its second straight road game in a stretch of three consecutive away games. The Midshipmen are 0-2 against the spread this season, failing to cover as a heavy home favorite against Towson and as a road favorite at Florida Atlantic. The market has Navy as a touchdown favorite, but the situational factors (long rest, travel, hostile environment, UAB's 2-1 ATS record) suggest this line is too high.

The market is more confident in Navy than this team's two-game body of work justifies marketFavorsUAB

Navy is 1-1 with a narrow loss to a Florida Atlantic team that was 0-1 and had just allowed 300 rushing yards. The Midshipmen have not covered a spread all season and their power rating has barely moved from its preseason mark. UAB is 1-2 but 2-1 against the spread, meaning the Blazers have been more competitive than their record suggests. The prediction market gives Navy a strong win probability, but that number is built on preseason expectations and Navy's brand name rather than what has actually happened on the field in 2026. The market is favoring Navy by more than this team's demonstrated performance warrants, and the direction of value is toward UAB.

Navy's rushing depth remains a genuine edge that can control the game offenseFavorsNavy

Despite the passing struggles, Navy's ground game is still the best thing it does. The Midshipmen ran for 506 yards against Towson with 14 different players carrying the ball, and even in the Florida Atlantic loss, Woodson and Jackson Gutierrez combined for 171 rushing yards and two touchdowns on 19 carries. UAB's defense has not faced an option attack of this caliber, and Navy's offensive line returns four starters from a unit that led the nation in rushing last season. If Navy can establish the run early, keep the ball away from UAB's offense, and avoid the slow starts that plagued it against Florida Atlantic, the Midshipmen can win comfortably. This is the one area where Navy's strengths clearly outweigh UAB's, and it is why the market's favoritism is not entirely misplaced.

UAB

UAB's red-zone offense is costing it points and will keep this game within the number offenseFavorsUAB

In the opener at Illinois, UAB outgained the Illini 413-333 but settled for three Jonah Delange field goals and lost by 19. Against UL Monroe, the Blazers again needed a late 43-yard touchdown to EJ Reid and a 42-yard Delange field goal to escape 26-20, failing to cover as a double-digit home favorite. Ryder Burton has moved the ball between the 20s, but the offense has repeatedly stalled in scoring territory, and that pattern is the single biggest reason UAB has not turned yardage into margin. Navy's defense is not elite, but if UAB keeps trading touchdowns for field goals, the Blazers will struggle to outscore a Midshipmen team that is 0-2 against the spread but has played competitively.

Todd Grantham's rebuilt defense has yet to force consistent stops and now faces Navy's unique triple-option defenseFavorsNavy

The transfer-heavy unit allowed 42 points at Illinois and then let a winless UL Monroe team build a 14-3 lead and rush for 93 yards on 17 carries from quarterback Austin Carlisle. Ike Esonwune's late interception and a fourth-down stop saved the Blazers, but the defense needed those takeaways to survive a Sun Belt opponent at home. Navy's triple-option is a completely different challenge that requires discipline and assignment football, and UAB's defense has shown neither consistently. If the Blazers cannot get off the field on third down, Navy will control the clock and keep this game low-possession.

The market is treating UAB as a clear home underdog, and that read looks slightly too harsh given the Blazers' competitiveness in both games marketFavorsUAB

The line and prediction market both install Navy as a solid favorite, which is consistent with the power-rating gap and the Midshipmen's 1-1 record. But UAB has outgained both opponents, lost by 19 at Illinois only after a Hail Mary and a pick-six, and beat UL Monroe despite a late deficit. The Blazers have shown they can move the ball and create takeaways, and Navy's own 1-1 record is not overwhelming. This is not a spot where UAB should be written off, and the market's confidence in a comfortable Navy win is modestly overstated.

UAB's running back depth is its best weapon for controlling this game and keeping Ryder Burton out of obvious passing downs offenseFavorsUAB

Rod Robinson II ran for 114 yards on 21 carries against UL Monroe, and the backfield also includes Ja'Vin Simpkins and Bam McReynolds, who combined for over 1,200 rushing yards last season. Against Illinois, game script forced UAB into passing situations and the offense stalled. At home against Navy, the Blazers need to stay balanced and lean on Robinson and company to shorten the game, limit Midshipmen possessions, and protect a quarterback who has only four career starts. If UAB can run the ball effectively on early downs, it has a path to keep this within one score.

The short week and home field are neutral factors, but the Friday night environment could favor Navy's disciplined approach situationalFavorsNavy

UAB has only five days of rest after traveling to Louisiana, while Navy has had a full week to prepare. The Blazers' home-field advantage is among the strongest in the league, but Navy's triple-option offense is notoriously difficult to prepare for on a short week, and the Midshipmen are well-coached and disciplined. UAB's only win came at home against a winless UL Monroe team, and handling the unique challenges of Navy's offense will be critical. The short week may negate some of the home-field edge, making this a more even matchup than the line suggests.

What were the weather conditions for Navy vs UAB?

At kickoff, conditions at Protective Stadium were Sunny, 74°F with winds of 5 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. Historical weather data for this game is preserved in the panel alongside. Weather data is sourced from WeatherAPI.com.

What happened in the game?

Navy travels 687 miles to this game, a moderate road trip.

Navy arrives with a 1-hour westward body clock shift, short of the two-zone westward threshold where travel starts to price.

UAB won by 4 in a closely contested finish.

UAB covered the spread by a solid margin.

The total went Under by 7.5 points.

How do Navy and UAB compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favor Navy (-1.9) over UAB (-14.7) by 12.8 points on a neutral field. Despite playing at home, UAB faces a power rating deficit. Check whether the market spread accounts for this gap. UAB brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.8). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input: cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

UAB won and UAB covered the spread.

Conditions

as of September 25, 2026 Game-time

Sunny

74°F

Rain3%
Precip0.00"
Humidity58%
Wind5 mph NNE
Gusts9 mph
Wind map for Navy at UAB: aerial view of Protective Stadium, wind from the NNE at 5.1 mph, gusting to 9.2 mph

Quick facts

Week
Week 4
Kickoff (local)
06:00 PM CDT
Venue
Protective Stadium
Capacity
47,100
Elevation
623 ft
Surface
Artificial Turf

Travel and rest

Measure NavyAway UABHome
This week687 miles0 miles
Last weekBye week766 miles
Season total2,474 miles1,686 miles
Body clock19:0018:00
Rest13 days5 days