DraftKings · as of September 25, 2026
UAB defeated Navy 24–20 in a closely contested finish. UAB covered by 10.5; Game went Under by 7.5. The market closed at Navy -6.5 and the Blue Chip model made it Navy -10.4 - a gap of 3.9 points toward Navy, of which 2.6 points were beyond the model's measured factors. That was an information gap - the market pricing something the model does not carry - rather than a measured edge. Blue Chip Analytics had rated Navy 12.8 points stronger on a neutral field.
Florida Atlantic's Caden Veltkamp torched Navy for five touchdown passes and 386 yards on 27-of-32 passing, with Easton Messer alone going for 179 yards and two scores. That came one week after Towson's Andrew Indorf threw for 208 yards and two long touchdowns on just 18 attempts. Navy's rebuilt pass rush, which lost All-America nose guard Landon Robinson, has generated almost nothing without blitzing, and the secondary has been beaten repeatedly over the top. UAB does not need to be explosive to exploit this; it only needs to throw efficiently. The market has Navy as a solid road favorite, but that price reflects the Midshipmen's rushing reputation and UAB's poor power rating, not the reality that Navy has allowed 594 passing yards and seven passing touchdowns in two games. This is the single biggest reason to doubt the market's confidence in Navy.
Navy rushed for 506 yards against Towson and still has a dominant ground game, but the passing attack has been nonexistent. Woodson was 3-of-11 for 47 yards with an interception against Florida Atlantic, and the Midshipmen completed just six passes total as a team. When Navy fell behind 38-7, it could not throw its way back into the game; the comeback came on the ground and via a safety. UAB, which is 2-1 against the spread, has seen enough option-style offense to prepare, and if the Blazers load the box and force Woodson to beat them through the air, Navy has shown no evidence it can do so. The market's line assumes Navy's offense will move the ball at will, but the passing inefficiency makes that assumption fragile.
Navy has not played since September 12, a 13-day layoff that followed a short week of preparation for Florida Atlantic. While rest can help heal injuries, it also risks rust for an option offense that relies on timing and repetition. UAB has a real home-field advantage, and Navy is traveling 687 miles for its second straight road game in a stretch of three consecutive away games. The Midshipmen are 0-2 against the spread this season, failing to cover as a heavy home favorite against Towson and as a road favorite at Florida Atlantic. The market has Navy as a touchdown favorite, but the situational factors (long rest, travel, hostile environment, UAB's 2-1 ATS record) suggest this line is too high.
Navy is 1-1 with a narrow loss to a Florida Atlantic team that was 0-1 and had just allowed 300 rushing yards. The Midshipmen have not covered a spread all season and their power rating has barely moved from its preseason mark. UAB is 1-2 but 2-1 against the spread, meaning the Blazers have been more competitive than their record suggests. The prediction market gives Navy a strong win probability, but that number is built on preseason expectations and Navy's brand name rather than what has actually happened on the field in 2026. The market is favoring Navy by more than this team's demonstrated performance warrants, and the direction of value is toward UAB.
Despite the passing struggles, Navy's ground game is still the best thing it does. The Midshipmen ran for 506 yards against Towson with 14 different players carrying the ball, and even in the Florida Atlantic loss, Woodson and Jackson Gutierrez combined for 171 rushing yards and two touchdowns on 19 carries. UAB's defense has not faced an option attack of this caliber, and Navy's offensive line returns four starters from a unit that led the nation in rushing last season. If Navy can establish the run early, keep the ball away from UAB's offense, and avoid the slow starts that plagued it against Florida Atlantic, the Midshipmen can win comfortably. This is the one area where Navy's strengths clearly outweigh UAB's, and it is why the market's favoritism is not entirely misplaced.
In the opener at Illinois, UAB outgained the Illini 413-333 but settled for three Jonah Delange field goals and lost by 19. Against UL Monroe, the Blazers again needed a late 43-yard touchdown to EJ Reid and a 42-yard Delange field goal to escape 26-20, failing to cover as a double-digit home favorite. Ryder Burton has moved the ball between the 20s, but the offense has repeatedly stalled in scoring territory, and that pattern is the single biggest reason UAB has not turned yardage into margin. Navy's defense is not elite, but if UAB keeps trading touchdowns for field goals, the Blazers will struggle to outscore a Midshipmen team that is 0-2 against the spread but has played competitively.
The transfer-heavy unit allowed 42 points at Illinois and then let a winless UL Monroe team build a 14-3 lead and rush for 93 yards on 17 carries from quarterback Austin Carlisle. Ike Esonwune's late interception and a fourth-down stop saved the Blazers, but the defense needed those takeaways to survive a Sun Belt opponent at home. Navy's triple-option is a completely different challenge that requires discipline and assignment football, and UAB's defense has shown neither consistently. If the Blazers cannot get off the field on third down, Navy will control the clock and keep this game low-possession.
The line and prediction market both install Navy as a solid favorite, which is consistent with the power-rating gap and the Midshipmen's 1-1 record. But UAB has outgained both opponents, lost by 19 at Illinois only after a Hail Mary and a pick-six, and beat UL Monroe despite a late deficit. The Blazers have shown they can move the ball and create takeaways, and Navy's own 1-1 record is not overwhelming. This is not a spot where UAB should be written off, and the market's confidence in a comfortable Navy win is modestly overstated.
Rod Robinson II ran for 114 yards on 21 carries against UL Monroe, and the backfield also includes Ja'Vin Simpkins and Bam McReynolds, who combined for over 1,200 rushing yards last season. Against Illinois, game script forced UAB into passing situations and the offense stalled. At home against Navy, the Blazers need to stay balanced and lean on Robinson and company to shorten the game, limit Midshipmen possessions, and protect a quarterback who has only four career starts. If UAB can run the ball effectively on early downs, it has a path to keep this within one score.
UAB has only five days of rest after traveling to Louisiana, while Navy has had a full week to prepare. The Blazers' home-field advantage is among the strongest in the league, but Navy's triple-option offense is notoriously difficult to prepare for on a short week, and the Midshipmen are well-coached and disciplined. UAB's only win came at home against a winless UL Monroe team, and handling the unique challenges of Navy's offense will be critical. The short week may negate some of the home-field edge, making this a more even matchup than the line suggests.
At kickoff, conditions at Protective Stadium were Sunny, 74°F with winds of 5 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. Historical weather data for this game is preserved in the panel alongside. Weather data is sourced from WeatherAPI.com.
Sunny
74°F

| Measure | NavyAway | UABHome |
|---|---|---|
| This week | 687 miles | 0 miles |
| Last week | Bye week | 766 miles |
| Season total | 2,474 miles | 1,686 miles |
| Body clock | 19:00 | 18:00 |
| Rest | 13 days | 5 days |