Eastern Michigan Eagles is 1-1 on the season, 1-1 against the spread, and holds a power rating of -15.5. Eastern Michigan Eagles enters the season with a power rating of -15.5, placing them below average relative to the FBS midpoint. The Eastern Michigan Eagles head to Michigan State next in Week 2. In 2025, Eastern Michigan Eagles went 4-8 overall, 7-4-1 against the spread, and 6-6 on totals.
In Week 1 of 2026 the Eastern Michigan Eagles Power Rating of -15.5 is 15.5 points below the FBS average according to Blue Chip Analytics. Eastern Michigan Eagles have logged 0 miles of travel so far, out of a season total of 2,818 miles, ranking 136th heaviest in the FBS.
Noah Kim QB, Joshua Long TE, Nick Devereaux WR, Harold Mack WR, Braydon Bennett RB, Nicholas Gallegos OL
Bryce Llewellyn S, Barry Manning LB, Caleb Coley CB, Zach Mowchan LB, Carter Evans EDGE, Jefferson Adam DL
Rudy Kessinger K, Daniel Hull P
| After | Record | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 |
| Week 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-1 |
| Week 3 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 2-1 |
| Week 4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
| Week 5 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 3-2 |
| Week 6 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 4-2 |
| Week 7 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 4-3 |
| Week 8 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 5-3 |
| Week 9 | 2-7 | 5-4 | 5-4 |
| Week 11 | 3-7 | 6-4 | 5-5 |
| Week 12 | 4-7 | 7-4 | 5-6 |
| Week 14 | 4-8 | 7-4-1 | 6-6 |
A season record is a record, not a forecast. Blue Chip Analytics' own research finds that beating the closing line repeats at close to zero from one season to the next - see most underrated and overrated teams. Read the table as what happened, not as what is likely to happen next.
Opened -16.5 in the preseason and finished -15.5 after week 2, a move of +1.0 points. High -14.1 (week 1), low -16.5 (the preseason).
PreW2
SP+ is an independent opponent-adjusted efficiency rating, one of the systems blended into the Blue Chip Analytics power rating rather than a Blue Chip Analytics number itself. Defensive SP+ measures points allowed, so a lower figure is a better defence - the rank beside it already accounts for that.
Source spread is how far apart the independent rating systems are on this team, not a margin of error on our own number. A wide spread means the models disagree, which is itself worth knowing.
The measured home field advantage of -0.5 is regressed to +1.5 before it is applied, a difference of 2.0 points. A single venue's raw result carries a lot of noise, so the applied figure is pulled toward the league pattern. See how much is home field advantage really worth.
| Opponent | Met | Record | ATS |
|---|---|---|---|
| San José State | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 |
| Wisconsin | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Massachusetts | 4 | 4-0 | 1-3 |
| Akron | 5 | 4-1 | 2-2-1 |
| Toledo | 9 | 2-7 | 6-3 |
| Ohio | 5 | 1-4 | 2-3 |
| Central Michigan | 10 | 4-6 | 3-7 |
| Western Michigan | 10 | 4-6 | 6-3-1 |
| Kent State | 6 | 4-2 | 4-2 |
No meeting on record since 2016: Sacramento State, Michigan State, Lindenwood.
Week 02,818 mi total
| Week | Opponent | Distance | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Sacramento State | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 1 | San José State | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 2 | Michigan State | 54 mi | 107 mi |
| Week 3 | Wisconsin | 299 mi | 705 mi |
| Week 4 | Lindenwood | Home | 705 mi |
| Week 5 | Massachusetts | 569 mi | 1,843 mi |
| Week 6 | Akron | 138 mi | 2,118 mi |
| Week 7 | Toledo | Home | 2,118 mi |
| Week 8 | Ohio | 218 mi | 2,554 mi |
| Week 9 | - | Bye | |
| Week 10 | Central Michigan | 31 mi | 2,617 mi |
| Week 11 | - | Bye | |
| Week 12 | Western Michigan | 100 mi | 2,818 mi |
| Week 13 | Kent State | Home | 2,818 mi |
| Week 14 | - | Bye | |
| Week 15 | - | Bye | |
| Week 16 | - | Bye | |
| Postseason | - | Bye | |
Eastern Michigan's offense runs through fifth-year quarterback Noah Kim, who has thrown for 453 yards with three touchdowns and one interception through two games. He has a reliable group of targets, including tight end Joshua Long, receiver Nick Devereaux, and Harold Mack, who caught a touchdown in the San Jose State loss. The Eagles have leaned on the pass, and Kim's experience is a major reason they have been competitive. The ground game, led by graduate transfer Braydon Bennett, has not yet become a consistent threat, so the passing attack will need to carry the offense as the schedule gets tougher.
Eastern Michigan allowed a league-high 232.1 rushing yards per game last season, and early results suggest the issue is not fully fixed. They held Sacramento State to a modest total in the opener, but San Jose State's Jabari Bates ran for 119 yards, and the Spartans controlled the clock in the fourth quarter. The front seven is still unproven, with Carter Evans as the only established starter on the line and Jefferson Adam returning from a missed season. Opponents with a capable ground game will likely continue to test this unit, and the Eagles will need improved play from their defensive line and linebackers to avoid being worn down.
Eastern Michigan opened with a 28-17 win over Sacramento State, but the game was closer than the final score suggests, as the Hornets pulled within 11 in the fourth quarter. Against San Jose State, the Eagles led 21-17 entering the final period but were outscored 10-0 and managed just 25 yards of offense in the fourth quarter. The defense forced a key fumble that Bryce Llewellyn recovered, but the offense could not sustain drives late. Closing out games will be critical, especially in MAC play where margins are often thin.
Rudy Kessinger has not attempted a field goal in the first two games, so his reliability from long range remains untested. The punting game, with Daniel Hull taking over, has been adequate but not a major factor. The Eagles have committed turnovers at costly moments, including a Kim fumble returned for a touchdown against Sacramento State and an interception against San Jose State. They have also forced turnovers, with Jason Marshall's interception sealing the opener and Llewellyn's fumble recovery setting up a scoring chance. Limiting mistakes and winning the turnover battle will be essential in close games.
Eastern Michigan travels to Michigan State in Week 2 as a heavy underdog, with the prediction market giving them just a 12% chance to win. After that, the Eagles face a MAC schedule that includes a home game against UMass and a trip to Lindenwood, but they will need to find wins elsewhere to reach bowl eligibility. The team has shown it can compete with mid-tier FBS opponents, but the defense's struggles against the run and the offense's inconsistency in the fourth quarter are concerns. The next few weeks will reveal whether this team can build on its early promise or if the same issues that plagued last season will resurface.
Eastern Michigan Eagles is 1-1 against the spread in the 2026 season, covering 50% of games.
Eastern Michigan Eagles holds a Blue Chip Analytics power rating of -15.5, representing their expected point margin against an average FBS team on a neutral field.
Eastern Michigan Eagles's home field advantage rating is 1.5 points, the venue adjustment Blue Chip Analytics applies for games at their home stadium.
Eastern Michigan Eagles's consensus regular-season win total for 2026 is 5.5 wins, priced at -170 over and +135 under. This is the betting market's expectation, not a Blue Chip Analytics projection.
Eastern Michigan Eagles travels 2,818 miles in the 2026 season, ranking 136th heaviest in the FBS.
Cumulative travel distance counts both the outbound and return journey for every away game. For example, if a team travels 374 miles to play an away game, Blue Chip Analytics counts 748 miles (374 miles there, 374 miles back) toward the cumulative total. Home games and bye weeks add zero miles. The per-week Distance column shows the one-way distance only, as the return trip happens after the game is played.
Eastern Michigan Eagles: 1-1 overall, 1-1 ATS, power rating -15.5 (2026 records).