26
Final
23
38
Final
61
13
Final
20
30
Final
24
34
Final
6
31
Final
34
34
Final
41
16
Final
35
19
Final
16
38
Final
35
14
Final
28
28
Final
31
38
Final
45
14
Final
42
24
Final
20
13
Final
6
20
Final
59
49
Final
51
23
Final
52
24
Final
37
38
Final
17
24
Final
25
28
Final
27
20
Final
35
10
Final
21
24
Final
27
56
Final
21
31
Final
39
24
Final
31
20
Final
31
49
Final
39
10
Final
13
23
Final
15
10
Final
28
17
Final
34
49
Final
27
17
Final
28
20
Final
24
21
Final
14
13
Final
28
31
Final
35
0
Final
26
31
Final
10
49
Final
56
20
Final
16
24
Final
57
32
Final
38
3
Final
39
17
Final
20
7
Final
24
27
Final
34
17
Final
34
31
Final
30
42
Final
19
16
Final
21
13
Final
21
Texas A&M Aggies is 4-4 on the season, 4-4 against the spread, and holds a power rating of +9.7. Texas A&M Aggies's games are hitting the under at 62% this season (5-3), a notable trend for totals bettors. The Texas A&M Aggies head to South Carolina next in Week 10.
In Week 8 of 2026 the Texas A&M Aggies Power Rating of +9.7 is 9.7 points above the FBS average according to Blue Chip Analytics. Texas A&M Aggies have logged 2,943 miles of travel so far, out of a season total of 5,440 miles, ranking 96th heaviest in the FBS.
Marcel Reed QB, Rueben Owens II RB, Mario Craver WR, Ashton Bethel-Roman WR, Isaiah Horton WR, Mark Nabou Jr. OL, Wilkin Formby OL, Tyree Adams OL, Terry Bussey WR
Marcus Ratcliffe S, Dalton Brooks S, Dezz Ricks CB, Marco Jones EDGE, Anto Saka EDGE, Ray Coney LB
David Olano K
| After | Record | ATS | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 |
| Week 2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 2-0 |
| Week 3 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 3-0 |
| Week 5 | 4-0 | 1-3 | 3-1 |
| Week 6 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 3-2 |
| Week 7 | 6-0 | 3-3 | 4-2 |
| Week 8 | 7-0 | 3-4 | 5-2 |
| Week 9 | 8-0 | 4-4 | 6-2 |
| Week 11 | 9-0 | 5-4 | 7-2 |
| Week 12 | 10-0 | 5-5 | 8-2 |
| Week 13 | 11-0 | 5-6 | 8-3 |
| Week 14 | 11-1 | 5-7 | 8-4 |
| Postseason | 11-2 | 5-8 | 8-5 |
A season record is a record, not a forecast. Blue Chip Analytics' own research finds that beating the closing line repeats at close to zero from one season to the next - see most underrated and overrated teams. Read the table as what happened, not as what is likely to happen next.
Opened +19.9 in the preseason and finished +9.7 after week 8, a move of -10.2 points. High +21.8 (week 3), low +9.4 (week 7).
PreW8
SP+ is an independent opponent-adjusted efficiency rating, one of the systems blended into the Blue Chip Analytics power rating rather than a Blue Chip Analytics number itself. Defensive SP+ measures points allowed, so a lower figure is a better defence - the rank beside it already accounts for that.
Source spread is how far apart the independent rating systems are on this team, not a margin of error on our own number. A wide spread means the models disagree, which is itself worth knowing.
The measured home field advantage of +4.1 is regressed to +3.0 before it is applied, a difference of 1.1 points. A single venue's raw result carries a lot of noise, so the applied figure is pulled toward the league pattern. See how much is home field advantage really worth.
| Opponent | Met | Record | ATS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | 1 | 1-0 | 1-0 |
| LSU | 10 | 5-5 | 3-7 |
| Arkansas | 10 | 9-1 | 5-5 |
| Missouri | 3 | 3-0 | 3-0 |
| Alabama | 8 | 1-7 | 4-4 |
| South Carolina | 10 | 8-2 | 4-6 |
| Tennessee | 3 | 2-1 | 2-1 |
| Texas | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
No meeting on record since 2016: Missouri State, Arizona State, The Citadel, Oklahoma.
Week 05,440 mi total
| Week | Opponent | Distance | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | - | Bye | |
| Week 1 | Missouri State | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 2 | Arizona State | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 3 | Kentucky | Home | 0 mi |
| Week 4 | LSU | 308 mi | 616 mi |
| Week 5 | Arkansas | Home | 616 mi |
| Week 6 | Missouri | 617 mi | 1,850 mi |
| Week 7 | The Citadel | Home | 1,850 mi |
| Week 8 | Alabama | 547 mi | 2,943 mi |
| Week 9 | - | Bye | |
| Week 10 | South Carolina | 925 mi | 4,794 mi |
| Week 11 | Tennessee | Home | 4,794 mi |
| Week 12 | Oklahoma | 323 mi | 5,440 mi |
| Week 13 | Texas | Home | 5,440 mi |
| Week 14 | - | Bye | |
| Week 15 | - | Bye | |
| Week 16 | - | Bye | |
| Postseason | - | Bye | |
Texas A&M sits at 4-3 with a stark split in performance. At Kyle Field, the Aggies are 4-0, outscoring opponents 173-27, including shutouts of Missouri State (50-0) and The Citadel (41-0). Away from home, they are 0-3, losing at LSU (6-35) and Missouri (6-27) while also falling at home to Kentucky (21-31). The offense has been the primary culprit in those losses, managing just 12 points in the two road defeats. The Aggies have yet to win a game outside College Station, and with three of their final five games on the road, that trend must reverse for a strong finish.
Quarterback Marcel Reed has shown flashes of the form that produced 3,169 passing yards and 25 touchdowns last season, but he has also been plagued by the turnover issues that marred his 2025 campaign. In the first two games, both wins, Reed threw for 396 yards with five touchdowns and one interception. In the three SEC losses, he completed just 55 of 114 passes (48.2%) for 531 yards with one touchdown and five interceptions, and he was pulled in favor of Brady Hart in the fourth quarter at LSU. Reed's confidence is the biggest swing factor for the rest of the season; if he can recapture his early-season rhythm, the offense has the weapons to be explosive.
With only center Mark Nabou Jr. returning from last season, the Aggies patched together an offensive line with four SEC transfers, including tackles Wilkin Formby (Alabama) and Tyree Adams (LSU). The unit has struggled with cohesion and penalties, committing eight for 80 yards in the opener and allowing multiple sacks in key games. Against LSU, the line was overwhelmed, and Reed was sacked four times. The run game has been inconsistent, though it showed life against Arkansas (231 yards) and The Citadel (dominated on the ground). For the Aggies to compete against the likes of Alabama and Texas, the line must gel quickly.
The Aggies' defense has been a tale of two units. The secondary, led by safeties Marcus Ratcliffe and Dalton Brooks and cornerback Dezz Ricks, was third in the SEC in passing defense last season and has flashed playmaking ability, scoring twice on defense against Arizona State (Marco Jones' 55-yard fumble return and Julio Humphrey's 45-yard interception return). However, the run defense has been gashed in consecutive SEC losses, allowing 222 yards to Missouri's Jamal Roberts and being outgained 506-197 by LSU. The pass rush, which ranked fourth nationally in sacks last season, is still adjusting without SEC Defensive Player of the Year Cashius Howell, though transfers Anto Saka and Marco Jones have shown promise. If the Aggies can shore up their run defense, the defense can keep them in games.
Texas A&M's remaining schedule is daunting, with road trips to Alabama, Texas, and a home game against Mississippi State, among others. The Aggies must find a way to win away from Kyle Field, where they have been outscored 62-12 in their last two road games. The offense needs to establish consistency, particularly in the passing game, and the defense must tighten up against the run. With a 4-3 record and an 0-3 mark in SEC play, the Aggies are playing for bowl positioning and pride. A strong finish could still salvage a respectable season, but it will require improved play from Reed, the offensive line, and a defense that has yet to prove it can stop a quality rushing attack.
Texas A&M Aggies is 4-4 against the spread in the 2026 season, covering 50% of games.
Texas A&M Aggies holds a Blue Chip Analytics power rating of +9.7, representing their expected point margin against an average FBS team on a neutral field.
Texas A&M Aggies's home field advantage rating is 3.0 points, the venue adjustment Blue Chip Analytics applies for games at their home stadium.
Texas A&M Aggies's consensus regular-season win total for 2026 is 8.5 wins, priced at -105 over and -125 under. This is the betting market's expectation, not a Blue Chip Analytics projection.
Texas A&M Aggies travels 5,440 miles in the 2026 season, ranking 96th heaviest in the FBS.
Cumulative travel distance counts both the outbound and return journey for every away game. For example, if a team travels 374 miles to play an away game, Blue Chip Analytics counts 748 miles (374 miles there, 374 miles back) toward the cumulative total. Home games and bye weeks add zero miles. The per-week Distance column shows the one-way distance only, as the return trip happens after the game is played.
Texas A&M Aggies: 4-4 overall, 4-4 ATS, power rating +9.7 (2026 records).