26 Final 23 38 Final 61 13 Final 20 30 Final 24 34 Final 6 31 Final 34 34 Final 41 16 Final 35 19 Final 16 38 Final 35 14 Final 28 28 Final 31 38 Final 45 14 Final 42 24 Final 20 13 Final 6 20 Final 59 49 Final 51 23 Final 52 24 Final 37 38 Final 17 24 Final 25 28 Final 27 20 Final 35 10 Final 21 24 Final 27 56 Final 21 31 Final 39 24 Final 31 20 Final 31 49 Final 39 10 Final 13 23 Final 15 10 Final 28 17 Final 34 49 Final 27 17 Final 28 20 Final 24 21 Final 14 13 Final 28 31 Final 35 0 Final 26 31 Final 10 49 Final 56 20 Final 16 24 Final 57 32 Final 38 3 Final 39 17 Final 20 7 Final 24 27 Final 34 17 Final 34 31 Final 30 42 Final 19 16 Final 21 13 Final 21
Week 7 •
Gerald J. Ford Stadium

Stanford10 @FINAL 34SMU

2-3 ACC Power rating: -3.0
3-2 ACC Power rating: 11.4

By · Last updated

How did the line hold up?

Market line
SMU -19.5
PM Implied
SMU -13.0
Blue Chip model
SMU -18.2
Edge
-1.3STAN
See details
◂ favors STANfavors SMU ▸Market: SMU -19.5
14.4 › SMU
The power ratings row was edited directly, please click reset to adjust by team
SMU
STAN
SMU
no impact
SMU
2 STAN2 SMU4 STAN4 SMUModel: SMU -18.2

Betting information

Spread
SMU -19.5
Total
55.5
Odds implied score
STAN 18.0 – 37.5 SMU
Prediction markets
SMU 89% win chance (Kalshi)

DraftKings · as of July 8, 2026

SMU defeated Stanford 34–10 to secure a comfortable win. SMU covered by 4.5; Game went Under by 11.5. The market closed at SMU -19.5 and the Blue Chip model made it SMU -18.2, an edge of 1.3 points toward Stanford.

What are the key factors for Stanford vs SMU?

Stanford

Offensive Struggles Against Pressure

Stanford's offense allowed six sacks and quarterback Ben Gulbranson was under constant pressure, leading to a critical 96-yard pick-six that sealed the game. This indicates a vulnerability against aggressive defensive lines.

Resilience in Short Bursts

Despite the loss, Stanford showed ability to respond quickly, driving 75 yards in 33 seconds to score a touchdown just before halftime. This suggests the offense can execute efficiently when given time.

Defensive Concerns Against Big Plays

The defense gave up an 87-yard rushing touchdown and a 42-yard receiving score, highlighting a susceptibility to explosive plays that could be exploited by future opponents.

Injury Impact and Recovery

Cornerback Aaron Morris was immobilized and taken to the hospital after a tackle but cleared tests and rejoined the team. His status for next week is uncertain, which could affect the secondary against Florida State.

Coaching Confidence Despite Loss

Interim coach Frank Reich expressed belief that Stanford is not outclassed by SMU, indicating a mindset that could motivate the team but also a need to address execution gaps before facing ranked opponents.

SMU

Dominant Defense and Turnovers

SMU's defense forced a 96-yard pick-6 and recorded six sacks, showcasing their ability to create game-changing plays and pressure the quarterback. This defensive performance was crucial in securing the win and will be a key factor against Clemson.

Explosive Plays from Chris Johnson Jr.

Chris Johnson Jr. broke out with an 87-yard rushing touchdown and a 42-yard receiving score, demonstrating big-play capability. His emergence adds a dynamic element to the offense that Clemson must account for.

Kevin Jennings' Efficiency and Mobility

Quarterback Kevin Jennings completed 22 of 30 passes for 247 yards and two touchdowns, showing accuracy and the ability to extend plays. His poise under pressure will be vital against Clemson's defense.

Historic Conference Winning Streak

SMU extended its regular-season ACC winning streak to 10 games, proving they belong in a power conference. This confidence and momentum could carry over into the tough matchup at Clemson.

Upcoming Challenge at Clemson

SMU faces a formidable Clemson team on the road next week. The Mustangs will need to replicate their defensive pressure and explosive offense to compete against a top-tier opponent.

What were the weather conditions for Stanford vs SMU?

At kickoff, conditions at Gerald J. Ford Stadium were Sunny, 93°F, heat index 91°F with winds of 5 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. Historical weather data for this game is preserved in the panel alongside. Weather data is sourced from WeatherAPI.com.

What happened in the game?

Stanford travels 1,467 miles to this game, a significant road trip.

Stanford arrives with a 2-hour eastward body clock shift, short of the two-zone westward threshold where travel starts to price.

SMU won by 24 to secure a comfortable win.

SMU covered the spread.

The total went Under by 11.5 points.

How do Stanford and SMU compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favor SMU (11.4) over Stanford (-3.0) by 14.4 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. SMU brings one of the stronger home environments in the FBS to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 3.8). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input: cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Where can I find more data on Stanford and SMU?

Sources

Game & Team Data

Weather

Travel & Rest

Model & Methodology

SMU won and SMU covered the spread.

Conditions

as of October 11, 2025 Game-time

Sunny

93°F

Rain0%
Precip0.00"
Humidity27%
Wind5 mph SSE
Gusts5 mph
Heat index91°F
Wind map for Stanford at SMU: aerial view of Gerald J. Ford Stadium, wind from the SSE at 4.5 mph, gusting to 5.1 mph

Quick facts

Week
Week 7
Kickoff (local)
11:00 AM CDT
Venue
Gerald J. Ford Stadium
Capacity
32,000
Elevation
594 ft
Surface
Artificial Turf

Travel and rest

StanfordAway SMUHome
This week1,467 miles0 miles
Last weekBye weekHome game
Season total12,205 miles791 miles
Body clock09:0011:00
Rest14 days7 days

Other games this week