Week 4 •
AlamodomeIndoor

Colorado State45 @FINAL 59UTSA , Week 4, Sep 26, 2026

2-1 Pac-12 Power rating: -8.9
2-1 American Power rating: 1.3

How did the line hold up?

Market line
UTSA -14.0
PM Implied
UTSA -11.0
Blue Chip model
UTSA -13.9
Edge
-0.1CSU
See details
◂ favors CSUfavors UTSA ▸Market: UTSA -14.0
10.2 › UTSA
Adjust the power ratings by team
The power ratings row was edited directly, please click reset to adjust by team
UTSA
no impact
no impact
no impact
no impact
2 CSU2 UTSA4 CSU4 UTSAModel: UTSA -13.9

Betting information

Spread
UTSA -14.0
Total
57.5
Odds implied score
CSU 21.8 – 35.8 UTSA
Prediction markets
UTSA 84% win chance (Kalshi)

DraftKings · as of September 26, 2026

UTSA defeated Colorado State 59–45 in a double-digit victory. Push covered by 0.0; Game went Over by 46.5. The market closed at UTSA -14.0 and the Blue Chip model made it UTSA -13.9. The two were within a point of each other, so there was no meaningful edge in this line.

What are the key factors for Colorado State vs UTSA?

Colorado State

Colorado State's offense has feasted on weak defenses and now faces its first real road test offenseFavorsUTSA

Hauss Hejny has been superb through three games, throwing nine touchdown passes with no interceptions and adding a 75-yard touchdown run against Southern Utah, but those performances came at home against Wyoming (which went 0-for-8 on third down) and Southern Utah (a lower-tier opponent). Against BYU, the first ranked defense the Rams faced, the offense managed only 23 points and the rebuilt offensive line struggled to protect Hejny. UTSA's defense is not BYU's caliber, but it is a step up from what Hejny saw in Weeks 1 and 2, and this is the Rams' first road game after three straight home games. The outside-zone run game that produced 678 yards against Southern Utah may not find the same lanes against a UTSA front that has held opponents in check. If Hejny is forced into obvious passing situations, the offense could sputter as it did against BYU.

Colorado State's turnover-happy defense has not faced a quarterback who can punish its aggression on the road defenseFavorsUTSA

Tyson Summers' attacking scheme generated five turnovers in the first two games, including Oumar Diomande's interception against Wyoming and a fumble recovery to close out the opener, but those came against inferior competition at home. Against BYU, the defense gave up 41 points and could not force the takeaways that had masked its vulnerabilities. UTSA's offense is more potent than Wyoming's or Southern Utah's, and the Roadrunners have covered in all three of their games. The Rams' cornerback position remains a question mark due to spring injuries, and if the defense overcommits or misses tackles, UTSA can hit chunk plays. The turnover margin is the most plausible path to keeping this game close, but the defense has not proven it can generate those turnovers against a quality opponent, especially on the road.

Colorado State's situational edge disappears with first road trip and indoor environment situationalFavorsUTSA

The Rams opened with three consecutive home games, zero travel, and a home-field advantage that helped produce over 40,000 fans and a 2-0 start. That edge is gone this week: Colorado State travels 855 miles to face UTSA in an indoor, climate-controlled venue where weather is not a factor. The Roadrunners' home-field advantage is among the strongest in the conference, and the Rams have not yet played a true road game under Jim Mora. While the Rams have a full week of rest, the loss of home comfort and the hostile environment could disproportionately affect a team with 76 new players and a first-time offensive coordinator. UTSA, meanwhile, is 2-1 and has covered in all three games, suggesting they are comfortable in their surroundings.

The market has priced Colorado State as a heavy underdog, and that may be slightly too pessimistic given Hejny's ball security marketFavorsColorado State

The betting line and prediction market have UTSA as a heavy favorite, reflecting the Roadrunners' 3-0 ATS record and the Rams' blowout loss to BYU. However, the market may be overvaluing UTSA's defense, which has not faced a quarterback as efficient as Hejny (nine touchdowns, zero interceptions). Colorado State's offense showed it can score quickly against lesser defenses, and UTSA's defense is not BYU's. If Hejny protects the ball and the Rams' aggressive defense forces a couple of turnovers, this game could be closer than the market expects. The line has not moved toward the Rams despite their offensive explosion in Week 2, suggesting sharp money is comfortable with UTSA, but the direction is unambiguous: the market is heavily favoring UTSA, and the Rams have a slim chance to win. Still, the gap may be slightly overstated.

UTSA

UTSA's defense has quietly outperformed its rebuilt reputation, and the market's heavy home favoritism is justified defenseFavorsUTSA

The Roadrunners lost most of their defensive production to graduation and the portal, and the preseason concern was that the new front seven and secondary would be a liability. Through three games, that concern looks overblown. UTSA held UT Rio Grande Valley to 16 points, limited a competent Texas State offense to 26 points and 149 rushing yards, and then held a top-five Texas team to 30 points while covering a massive spread. The defense has now covered in all three games, including as a heavy underdog in Austin. Colorado State brings a power rating far below Texas State's, and the Rams have not faced a defense as fast or as deep as UTSA's. The market has UTSA as a heavy home favorite, and given how the defense has performed against better offenses than Colorado State's, that confidence is warranted. This is not a case of the market overvaluing a rebuilt unit; it is the market correctly pricing a defense that has already answered the bell.

Owen McCown and the UTSA offense have found a late-game gear that Colorado State may not be able to match offenseFavorsUTSA

McCown threw for 214 yards and a touchdown in the win at Texas State, but the more important number is the 13-play, 78-yard drive he led in the final minutes, capped by Brandon High Jr.'s go-ahead score with 14 seconds left. That was a third-year starter coming off sports hernia surgery, operating a new offense under coordinator Rick Bowie, and executing under maximum pressure on the road. The supporting cast is deep: Will Henderson III ran for 80 yards on 14 carries against Texas State, High added 47 yards and the game-winner, and Mekhi Anderson and AJ Wilson each had 80-plus receiving yards. Against a Colorado State defense that is unlikely to present the speed or depth of Texas, McCown should have time to work the tempo and downfield concepts Bowie wants. The market's heavy home line implies UTSA scores in the 30s or more, and the offense's recent execution supports that.

The situational setup is as favorable as UTSA will get all season, and it compounds Colorado State's disadvantage situationalFavorsUTSA

UTSA returns home to the Alamodome, where it opened the season with a 45-16 win over UT Rio Grande Valley. The Roadrunners have zero travel for this game, a climate-controlled indoor environment, and a venue with a strong home-field advantage. Colorado State, by contrast, is traveling into that environment on a short week. UTSA is also coming off an eight-day rest period after the Texas game, while the Rams have had a normal week. The only minor negative is that UTSA's rest is listed at six days for this game, but that is a quirk of the schedule and not a real disadvantage given the zero travel and indoor conditions. The market's heavy home favoritism reflects this situational edge, and it is hard to argue with it. Colorado State's 2-1 record is respectable, but the Rams have not faced a team with UTSA's talent or a road environment like the Alamodome.

The market may be slightly underrating Colorado State's ability to keep this closer than the heavy line suggests marketFavorsColorado State

Colorado State is 2-1 and 2-1 against the spread, and its power rating, while well below UTSA's, is not that of a pushover. The Rams have covered in two of three games and will likely treat this as a chance to make a statement against an American Conference opponent. UTSA, meanwhile, is coming off an emotional and physical game at Texas, and there is a real risk of a letdown or a slow start. The Roadrunners covered a huge spread against UT Rio Grande Valley and won outright as a short underdog at Texas State, but they also gave up 26 points to a Texas State team that is now 0-2. If UTSA's offense sputters early or the defense gives up a couple of explosive plays, Colorado State could hang around longer than the line implies. This is a slight lean toward Colorado State covering, not a prediction of an upset, but the market's heavy home favoritism may be a touch too confident given UTSA's occasional defensive lapses and the potential for a post-Texas emotional hangover.

What were the weather conditions for Colorado State vs UTSA?

This game was played indoors at Alamodome in a climate-controlled environment. Weather was not a factor.

What happened in the game?

Colorado State travels 855 miles to this game, a significant road trip.

Colorado State arrives with a 1-hour eastward body clock shift, short of the two-zone westward threshold where travel starts to price.

UTSA won by 14 in a double-digit victory.

Push covered the spread narrowly.

The total went Over by 46.5 points.

How do Colorado State and UTSA compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favor UTSA (1.3) over Colorado State (-8.9) by 10.2 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. UTSA brings one of the stronger home environments in the FBS to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 3.8). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input: cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

UTSA won and Push covered the spread.

Conditions

Indoor, climate controlled

~72°F

Alamodome is a domed venue. Wind, precipitation and temperature are not factors in this game.

Quick facts

Week
Week 4
Kickoff (local)
11:00 AM CDT
Venue
Alamodome
Capacity
64,000
Elevation
738 ft
Surface
Artificial Turf

Travel and rest

Measure Colorado StateAway UTSAHome
This week855 miles0 miles
Last weekHome game149 miles
Season total855 miles243 miles
Body clock10:0011:00
Rest7 days6 days