Week 4 • September 26, 2026, 04:00 AM UTC
0-0
American
Power Rank: -4.9
@
0-0
SEC
Power Rank: 4.2

By · Last updated

Arkansas (power rating: 4.2) holds a 9.1-point edge over Tulsa (-4.9) on a neutral field per Blue Chip Analytics. Arkansas's home field adds 2.1 points to that edge at Razorback Stadium. See Line Value below.

General Information

Week: Week 4
Kick Off (at stadium): 11:00 PM CDT
Stadium: Razorback Stadium
Capacity: 76,212
Elevation: 1358 ft
HFA Rating: 2.1
Playing Surface: Grass

Betting Information

Spread None
Total (O/U) -
Odds Implied Score -
Power Rank Implied Line Arkansas -9.1

Line Value Calculator

Adjust any factor to update your projected line

Your line Arkansas +9.1
Implied value
Current line — edit to adjust
Arkansas perspective
Power ratings — edit to adjust
Tulsa
Arkansas
Home field — Razorback Stadium
Weather: Clear
Travel impact

Positive adjustment = favours home team

Does weather affect Tulsa vs Arkansas at Razorback Stadium?

Game-time forecast at Razorback Stadium shows Clear — 69.1°F, Feels Like 60.8°F with winds of 2.0 mph. Weather is not expected to be a meaningful factor in this game. The weather adjustment has been pre-filled in the Line Value Calculator above — adjust manually if conditions change before kick-off.

Weather Conditions

Forecast for: July 05, 2026
Clear

Clear

69.1°F

Feels Like: 60.8°F
Wind: 2.0 mph SSW
Gusts: 4.2 mph
Precipitation: 0.0"
Humidity: 86%
Rain Chance: 12%
Snow Chance: 0%

Travel & Rest

Tulsa (Away)

This Week: 98.9 miles
Last Week: Home Game
Season Total: 849.5 miles
Body Clock Time: 23:00
Rest Days: 7

Arkansas (Home)

This Week: 0.0 miles
Last Week: Home Game
Season Total: 2019.8 miles
Body Clock Time: 23:00
Rest Days: 7

What are the key factors for Tulsa vs Arkansas?

Tulsa: Key Factors

Quarterback Mobility Key Against Oklahoma State's Pass Rush

Baylor Hayes' dual-threat ability (376 rushing yards before sacks in 2025) will be critical against Oklahoma State's defense, especially with projected 26 mph winds limiting deep passing. Hayes' scrambling can extend plays and exploit any gaps in the Cowboys' rush lanes.

Inexperienced Skill Positions Face Tough Test

Tulsa must replace its top three rushers and receivers from 2025. Newcomer RB Trequan Jones (graded as the third-best transfer RB by PFF) will be relied upon heavily, but the lack of proven pass-catchers could stall drives against a Power 4 opponent.

Defensive Backs Must Contain Big Plays

Tulsa's secondary, led by All-Conference CB Elijah Green (5 INTs in 2025) and S Zach Williams (73 tackles, 2 FF), must prevent explosive plays that plagued the defense late last season. Oklahoma State's passing attack will test their discipline in windy conditions.

Home Field Advantage and Weather Factors

Playing at home (HFA 1.9) provides a boost, but 26 mph winds and rain could neutralize Tulsa's passing game and favor a ground-and-pound approach. The kicking game, with new kicker Marlon Hauck (no FGs in college), becomes a liability in adverse weather.

Linebacker Depth Concerns After Key Departure

The loss of leading tackler Ray Coney (129 stops) to Texas A&M leaves a void in the middle. Chris Thompson Jr. returns from a broken ankle but may be rusty, making Tulsa vulnerable to Oklahoma State's run game and short-to-intermediate passes.

Arkansas: Key Factors

Quarterback competition remains unresolved

Both KJ Jackson and AJ Hill have limited major-college experience, and the coaching staff has not yet settled on a starter. Jackson showed better decision-making in spring, but Hill has more familiarity with Silverfield's system. This uncertainty could lead to a rotation or a late decision, affecting offensive rhythm and consistency against North Alabama.

New-look offensive line must gel quickly

The Razorbacks return only two interior starters (Caden Kitler, Kobe Branham) and added three transfer tackles (Kavion Broussard, Bryant Williams, Malachi Breland). With limited time together, the line's cohesion will be tested, especially in pass protection and run blocking for the committee of Braylen Russell and Sutton Smith.

Defensive front seven features heavy turnover

While end Quincy Rhodes Jr. and linebacker Bradley Shaw are proven, the rest of the front seven is filled with transfers and freshmen. The three-down scheme relies on new faces like Hunter Osborne, David Oke, and Ja'Quavion Smith to step up immediately. North Alabama's offense could exploit early communication gaps.

Secondary depth is a major concern

Arkansas brought in six transfer cornerbacks and two new safeties, but none have significant experience together. Khmori House is a potential playmaker at Star, but the overall lack of continuity in the defensive backfield makes the unit vulnerable to big plays, especially if the pass rush doesn't get home.

Strong home-field advantage and favorable weather

Playing at home with a venue HFA of 2.1 and clear, 67°F conditions with moderate wind should benefit Arkansas. The Razorbacks avoid travel fatigue and can lean on a supportive crowd to help mask some of the early-season growing pains against an FCS opponent.

What do the matchup numbers say?

Tulsa travels 99 miles to this game, a short road trip.

How do Tulsa and Arkansas compare on power ratings?

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings favour Arkansas (4.2) over Tulsa (-4.9) by 9.1 points on a neutral field. After adding home field advantage, the rating-implied line may differ meaningfully from the market spread. Arkansas brings a meaningful home field advantage to this matchup (Blue Chip HFA: 2.1). Add this to the neutral-site differential to arrive at a venue-adjusted line.

Blue Chip Analytics power ratings represent expected point margin against an average FBS opponent on a neutral field, calculated from game data sourced via CollegeFootballData.com (CFBD). They are one input — cross-reference with the travel, rest, and weather data above before drawing conclusions.

Sources

Weather

Blue Chip Analytics rates Arkansas as the stronger team by 9.1 points on a neutral field; apply HFA and travel context before finalising a line read.