14 Final 28 9 Final 20 7 Final 42 14 Final 51 7 Final 38 31 Final 35 45 Final 19 9 Final 56 24 Final 34 0 Final 34 20 Final 27 13 Final 16 14 Final 62 48 Final 45 0 Final 66 17 Final 45 3 Final 77 22 Final 44 10 Final 42 7 Final 55 22 Final 32 31 Final 42 0 Final 70 36 Final 27 12 Final 59 43 Final 36 13 Final 20 6 Final 45 24 Final 38 16 Final 27 30 Final 23 7 Final 31 20 Final 34 17 Final 72 27 Final 26 6 Final 28 33 Final 30 3 Final 69 17 Final 45 7 Final 31 10 Final 17 10 Final 42 18 Final 16 20 Final 38 17 Final 20 14 Final 56 21 Final 20 6 Final 54 3 Final 56 14 Final 56 9 Final 63 3 Final 35 33 Final 31 24 Final 21 21 Final 45 17 Final 21 38 Final 16 20 Final 3 7 Final 68 10 Final 38 3 Final 45 35 Final 9 28 Final 23 40 Final 42 20 Final 59 13 Final 24 0 Final 68 44 Final 20 0 Final 13 17 Final 34 7 Final 23 20 Final 24 3 Final 42 0 Final 73 23 Final 30 10 Final 34 14 Final 21 17 Final 42 3 Final 48 13 Final 36 3 Final 27 10 Final 70 20 Final 37

College Football Consensus Prediction

By · Last updated

The BlueChip Consensus Prediction tool collects crowd-sourced margin predictions across 10 hypothetical neutral-site matchups drawn from a pool of 241 FBS and FCS teams, then aggregates them into a bottom-up power rating that runs independently of the model. Each session pairs teams within roughly 10 rating points of each other, so your predictions stay calibrated. For model users comparing crowd intuition against BlueChip’s algorithm, the consensus is most informative when submissions are spread across the full team pool rather than concentrated in familiar programmes.

How Does the BlueChip Consensus Prediction Tool Work?

The tool presents 10 hypothetical neutral-site matchups and asks you to predict the winning margin for each using a slider. Matchups are generated from teams with similar BlueChip power ratings — within roughly 10 rating points — so each pairing is genuinely competitive rather than a blowout on paper. You need to complete at least 5 matchups before submitting.

Neutral-site framing is intentional. Home field advantage is worth roughly 2.5–3.5 points at FBS level, and stripping it out isolates your read on raw team quality. That makes predictions comparable across matchups and aggregatable into a single rating scale.

Your submitted margins are stored server-side and combined with other respondents’ predictions. The aggregate output is a crowd-sourced power rating — a bottom-up complement to BlueChip’s model-derived ratings, which are calculated from actual game results.

How to Interpret Consensus Results

The consensus rating reflects the median predicted margin across all submitted matchups for each team. A high consensus rating means respondents consistently expect that team to win by a wide margin on a neutral field. A low or negative rating means the crowd sees them as underdogs in most pairings.

The most useful comparison is between the crowd consensus and BlueChip’s model rating for the same team. Large divergences — where the crowd rates a team significantly higher or lower than the model — may reflect recency bias, fan loyalty effects, or genuine information the model hasn’t fully priced in yet.

For spread analysis, treat the consensus as a directional signal rather than a precise line. See the methodology page for how BlueChip’s model-derived ratings are constructed and how the two approaches compare.

When to Skip This Tool

  • You want a game-specific projection — use the individual game pages instead, which incorporate home field, travel, weather, and rest.
  • You only follow a small number of programmes closely. Guessing on unfamiliar matchups adds noise to the consensus rather than signal.
  • You’re looking for live odds or spread data — this tool collects predictions, it does not display market lines.

Sources

Seed Rankings

Survey Data

  • Respondent margin predictions — stored server-side and aggregated to produce the crowd-sourced consensus rating
Loading matchups...

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the BlueChip Consensus Prediction tool work?

The tool presents 10 hypothetical neutral-site matchups drawn from a pool of 241 FBS and FCS teams, paired by BlueChip power rating proximity. You predict the winning margin for each game using a slider. Once you’ve completed at least 5 matchups, you can submit. Your responses are stored server-side and aggregated with other submissions to build a crowd-sourced power rating.

Why are matchups at a neutral site?

Neutral-site framing removes home field advantage from your prediction, which is worth roughly 2.5 to 3.5 points at FBS level. This isolation is intentional: the tool is trying to measure your read on raw team quality, not situational factors. The resulting consensus estimates are comparable across all matchups on a level baseline.

How are matchups selected?

Matchups are generated at random from teams with similar BlueChip power ratings, within roughly 10 rating points of each other. Up to 40 percent of each session’s matchups feature top-tier teams rated 12.5 or higher. This keeps predictions calibrated: evenly-matched games produce more informative margins than large mismatches.

What does the consensus power rating measure?

The consensus rating aggregates predicted margins across all submitted surveys to estimate a crowd-sourced team strength score. It is a bottom-up complement to BlueChip’s model-derived power ratings, which are calculated from actual game results. Comparing the two can surface teams where crowd intuition diverges from the model.

Do I need an email address to participate?

No. Email is optional. If you provide one, BlueChip will send you the consensus power rating results when they are compiled. The email is used for that purpose only and is never shared or used for marketing.

When should I skip this tool?

Skip this tool if you want a game-specific spread projection — use the individual game pages for that. Also skip it if you only follow a small number of teams closely, since the tool asks you to rate matchups across the full range of FBS and FCS programmes and guessing on unfamiliar teams adds noise to the consensus.

How is the consensus prediction different from BlueChip power ratings?

BlueChip power ratings are calculated by a margin-of-victory model using actual game results. The consensus prediction is crowd-sourced: it reflects the aggregate judgment of people who have submitted predictions, not a statistical model. The two approaches can agree or diverge, and both are shown on the site so you can compare them.

The BlueChip Consensus Prediction tool is the only place on the site where crowd wisdom and model ratings can be compared directly — complete at least 5 neutral-site matchups to add your signal to the aggregate.